DEV Community

Cover image for Creating Scalable and Reusable React Components
Aral Roca
Aral Roca

Posted on • Edited on • Originally published at aralroca.com

Creating Scalable and Reusable React Components

Original article: https://aralroca.com/blog/creating-scalable-and-reusable-react-components

TLDR;

In this article, I will discuss a common issue that I have encountered in React applications: the creation of single-use components that lack the versatility and elegance of a truly reusable component. Rather than designing components for specific use cases, it is more beneficial to create generic components that can be adapted to various contexts.

Problem: Simple-use and overly contextualized components

Some developers argue that it is acceptable to initially create a single-use component and refactor it later if a similar component is needed elsewhere. While this approach may avoid violating the YAGNI principle, it is not ideal.

The YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It) principle is a software development practice that focuses on avoiding the implementation of unnecessary features. Instead of anticipating all possible future requirements and writing code for them, developers should write code only to meet the current project's needs.

...Are we doing the right thing here?

Consider an example where we are creating a ProductCardCarousel component because we will only use it momentarily for the product page.

We have created first the product page and placed a significant amount of logic there, and subsequently, we have transferred some of this logic into a component named ProductCardCarousel because it is responsible for displaying the products in a carousel.

First we implemented the product page:

export default function ProductPage({ products }) {
  return (
    <div>
      {/* ...more code here... */}
      <div className="product-carousel">
        {products.map((product) => (
          <div className="card" key={product.id}>
            <img src={product.image} alt="Product" />
            <h4>{product.name}</h4>
            <p>{product.description}</p>
          </div>
        ))}
      </div>
    </div>
  )
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Then transferred some logic into ProductCardCarousel:

export default function ProductPage({ products }) {
  return (
    <div>
      {/* ...more code here... */}
      <ProductCardCarousel products={products} />
    </div>
  )
}

// product-card-carousel.js
export function ProductCardCarousel({ products }) {
  return (
    <div className="product-carousel">
      {products.map((product) => (
        <div className="card" key={product.id}>
          <img src={product.image} alt="Product" />
          <h4>{product.name}</h4>
          <p>{product.description}</p>
        </div>
      ))}
    </div>
  )
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Does that make sense? πŸ€” Well, we are approaching this task inaccurately.

Creating single-use components is a bad practice because it can lead to inefficient and duplicative code. These components lack versatility and elegance and are designed for specific use cases, making it challenging to adapt them to different contexts. Placing a significant amount of logic in a specific part of the codebase can result in code duplication, as developers may need to create similar components for other use cases. Refactoring single-use components into reusable ones can also be challenging.

Shift in focus

The best practice is to design versatile and elegant components from the outset to avoid these issues.

What I propose is a shift in focus when implementing React components from the start. This change not only adheres to the YAGNI principle but also makes your project more scalable, allowing for more reusable components and reducing the need for future refactoring.

The key is to ensure that components are as "dumb" as possible concerning business logic. Their sole responsibility should be to serve as UI components that can receive any context required to fulfill their UI functionality.

When component names start to include business logic or other UI behaviors rather than just one UI element, it is a sign that the component may be overly contextualized. In the last ProductCardCarousel example, should not contain product-specific logic neither card-specific logic.

Lego pieces


React Components as Lego pieces

Developing a web page using React without first defining its components is akin to attempting to construct a Lego house without the requisite Lego pieces.

Solution: Components as Lego Blocks

To address this issue, it is helpful to approach the implementation of new React features by starting with the lower-level components and working your way up to the parent component, which will handle the business logic. The parent component can then use the created UI components (or existing ones) and feed them the necessary context without burdening them with the responsibility of managing business logic.

A common mistake is to begin at the top level. This approach often leads to the creation of a component containing all the logic, which is later broken down into smaller components. This only serves to pass the responsibility of managing business logic down through the component hierarchy. For example:

  • 1: ProductSection
    • 2: ProductSubsection
    • 3: ProductCardCarousel
    • 4: ProductCardList

This method does not make sense. It is reminiscent of working with a single HTML file 20 years agoβ€”the only difference is that the code is now distributed across multiple components.

The true power of components lies in their reusability and separation from business logic.

React Components as Lego Blocks: A Method for Scalable Development


React Components as Lego Blocks: A Method for Scalable Development

In order to fix the example above, development should begin with the Card component, which should be entirely agnostic to the business logic. Although the Card is required for displaying products, it should be adaptable to any context (e.g., product, user, etc.). Once the Card component is complete, developers can create both a List and a Carousel component to display cards. These components (List and Carousel) should also be context-agnostic, accepting any content such as Card, images, paragraphs, etc.

Finally, at the highest level, all these "Lego pieces" can be assembled to construct the ProductSection. By keeping the business logic at the top level, the ProductSection can combine these context-agnostic UI components to satisfy the requirements of the specific business model.

  • 4: ProductSection
    • 2: Carousel
    • 1: Card
    • 3: List
    • 1: Card

Simple example in code:

// card.js
export function Card({ image, alt, name, description }) {
  return (
    <div className="card">
      <img src={image} alt={alt} />
      <h4>{name}</h4>
      <p>{description}</p>
    </div>
  )
}

// carousel.js
export function Carousel({ children }) {
  return <div className="carousel">{children}</div>
}

// list.js
export function List({ children }) {
  return <div className="list">{children}</div>
}

// product-section.js
export default function ProductSection({ products }) {
  const productCards = products.map((product) => (
    <Card
      key={product.id}
      alt="Product"
      image={product.image}
      name={product.name}
      description={product.description}
    />
  ))

  return (
    <div className="product-section">
      {/* ...more code here... */}
      <h2>Products carousel</h2>
      <Carousel>{productCards}</Carousel>
      <h2>Products list</h2>
      <List>{productCards}</List>
    </div>
  )
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Once you have established your components, you can create not only the required web page but also other pages with entirely different business logic, leveraging the same building blocks.

The advantage of using reusable components is that they can be adapted to various contexts, providing a more efficient and effective development process. By designing generic components that can be utilized in different scenarios, developers can avoid duplicative and inefficient code, resulting in a more robust and scalable application.

Conclusion

In conclusion, when developing in React, it is crucial to avoid creating components that lack real utility or usefulness and are designed for single-use. Instead, developers should focus on creating generic components that can be used in many different contexts.

When implementing a new React feature, it is best to start with the lowest-level components and work up to the parent, which will have the business logic and can use the UI components that have been created to display the UI. This approach ensures that components are much more reusable and scalable and avoids violating the YAGNI principle.

Finally, developers should shift their focus from creating the simplest possible components to the business model. The only responsibility of a UI component should be to display the UI and be fed with any context necessary to fulfill its UI functionality. By following these guidelines, developers can create more efficient and maintainable React applications.

Generic components as Lego blocks that can be used in many different contexts


Generic components as Lego blocks that can be used in many different contexts

Top comments (2)

Collapse
 
josuto profile image
Josu Martinez • Edited

Nice article! Abstracting logic, weather is business or UI related, is paramount to build scalable and robust React (or other type of) apps. However, over-abstraction may lead to unwanted results.

Consider an app built by a team that defines many abstract components that are never reused; new joiners to the team may get confused, simply because we humans are not that good in understanding abstract structures. One possible consequence is that these new joiners may end up duplicating part or all of the abstract component, thus defeating the purpose of abstraction.

It is important to justify abstraction when developing any kind of app, independently of the language/library/framework used for that purpose. I personally like following the Rule of Three: when a similar code is used three times, then refactor it to an (abstract/concrete) artifact.

I also found this other article as a interesting source to know when and why to abstract React components.

Collapse
 
aralroca profile image
Aral Roca

Thanks @josuto, I appreciate your valuable feedback ☺️

I completely agree that over-abstraction should be avoided, and I want to make it clear that my article does not advocate for it.

My proposal is to shift the focus towards developing features that include only the necessary components. In this particular case, abstraction is necessary because the Card component is being reused both within the carousel and the list. Placing the Card component's content in other components would not make sense as they are not used elsewhere, and doing so would result in over-abstraction.

On the other hand, the approach I warned against would generate incorrect abstractions and make future refactoring and abstraction much more difficult. It's important to avoid bad abstractions, such as components that have multiple responsibilities and contain business logic.

So, the idea is that we should strive to create components that have a clear and single responsibility, leading to a more maintainable and reusable codebase.