Assuming you implemented a role-based access control system, what would you name a "readonly" role?
Here are my proposals so far, preference-ordered:
* Observer
* Spectator
* Monitor
* Watcher
* Reporter
* Guest
* Rubbernecker
* Greg
* Wallflower
* Mall-Cop
* Tattle-Tale
* Sloth
Top comments (7)
I think the answer could vary between applications depending on exactly what the user is expected to be doing.
Are they signed in? If so, the Guest might not be appropriate (Possible exception for something like the hotel industry)
Is there a there a "themed" name you could give the role? (This is pretty specific, but still comes up).
Yeah guest felt wrong but I couldn't put my finger on why! That's totally why
And yes yes yes context is always important -- I'm being purposefully vague here bc I wanna see where peoples' minds go 😊
Yes, I agree with Tyler, it depends on the application and role hierarchy.
For example:
Symfony uses the role 'anonymous' for not logged in users
Maybe 'viewer' or 'reader' :)
readerFor the record, I'm partial to Greg
ghost, sometimes is hard not to put awesome names in code and stick to clear descriptive names. It's a sad day when you have to chose a good name over an awesome one.
That’s the spirit! I’ll pitch it 🤞🏼