DEV Community

Cover image for A Guide to Server-Side Rendering
Builder.io profile image Luke Stahl
Luke Stahl for Builder.io

Posted on • Originally published at builder.io

A Guide to Server-Side Rendering

#webdev #html #javascript #programming

Server-side rendering (SSR) has been around for a while, but it's worth exploring further. This technique can make your web apps faster and more SEO-friendly.

In this guide, we'll explain SSR, why you might want to use it, and how to implement it without pulling your hair out. We'll cover the basics, compare it to client-side rendering, and discuss some practical examples.

What is server-side rendering?

Fundamentally, SSR is about rendering your web pages on the server instead of in the browser. When a user requests a page, the server does all the heavy lifting and sends a fully rendered page to the client. Then, the client-side JavaScript takes over to make it interactive.

The server is doing the prep work in the kitchen, and the browser just has to plate and serve.

Here's a minimal Express.js example:

const express = require('express');
const React = require('react');
const ReactDOMServer = require('react-dom/server');
const App = require('./App');

const app = express();

app.get('/', (req, res) => {
  const html = ReactDOMServer.renderToString(<App />);
  res.send(`
    <!DOCTYPE html>
    <html>
      <body>
        <div id="root">${html}</div>
        <script src="client.js"></script>
      </body>
    </html>
  `);
});

app.listen(3000, () => console.log('Server running on port 3000'));
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

From server to browser with fully rendered pages

When we talk about SSR delivering "fully rendered pages," it's important to understand what that actually means. Let's break it down:

What is a fully rendered page?

A fully rendered page is an HTML document containing all the content users would get when they first load the page. This includes:

  1. The complete DOM structure
  2. All text content
  3. Image placeholders and other media elements
  4. Initial styles

Here's a basic example:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <title>My SSR Page</title>
    <style>
      /* Initial styles */
    </style>
  </head>
  <body>
    <header>
      <h1>Welcome to My Site</h1>
      <nav><!-- Fully populated navigation --></nav>
    </header>
    <main>
      <article>
        <h2>Article Title</h2>
        <p>This is the full content of the article...</p>
      </article>
    </main>
    <footer><!-- Fully populated footer --></footer>
    <script src="hydration.js"></script>
  </body>
</html>
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The difference between CSR

In contrast, a client-side rendered (CSR) initial HTML might be like this:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <title>My CSR Page</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <div id="root"></div>
    <script src="bundle.js"></script>
  </body>
</html>
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The CSR page relies entirely on JavaScript to populate the content.

Benefits of fully rendered HTML

  1. Faster Initial Paint: The browser can start rendering content immediately.
  2. Better SEO: Search engines read all your content without executing JavaScript.
  3. Improved Accessibility: Screen readers and other assistive technologies can access content immediately.
  4. Resilience: Basic content is available even if JavaScript fails to load.

The hydration process

After sending the fully rendered HTML, SSR applications typically go through a process called hydration:

  1. The server sends the fully rendered HTML.
  2. The browser displays this HTML immediately.
  3. JavaScript loads and hydrates the page, adding interactivity.
// Simplified React hydration example
import { hydrateRoot } from 'react-dom/client';
import App from './App';

const domNode = document.getElementById('root');
hydrateRoot(domNode, <App />);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This process allows for fast initial loads while still providing the rich interactivity of modern web apps.

Remember, while SSR provides these fully rendered pages, it's not without trade-offs. The server does more work, and you'll need to handle the state carefully between the server and the client. However, for many applications, the benefits of fully rendered pages make SSR a compelling choice.

What's the difference between CSR and SSR?

Client Side Rendering (CSR) and Server Side Rendering (SSR) are two different approaches to rendering web pages. Here's a breakdown of their main differences:

Client-side rendering (CSR)

  1. The server sends a minimal HTML file with a JavaScript bundle.
  2. The browser downloads and runs the JavaScript.
  3. JavaScript creates the page content and makes it interactive.

Pros:

  • Smooth interactions after the initial load
  • Fewer server resources are needed

Cons:

  • Slower initial page load
  • Potential SEO challenges

Server-side rendering (SSR)

  1. The server creates the full HTML content.
  2. The browser receives and displays the pre-rendered HTML quickly.
  3. JavaScript then loads to make the page fully interactive.

Pros:

  • Faster initial page load
  • Better for SEO
  • Works well on slower devices

Cons:

  • It can be more complex to set up
  • May use more server resources

Here's a simple visual comparison:

Client-side rendering vs Server-side rendering

In essence, CSR works more in the browser, while SSR does more on the server. The choice between them depends on your project's specific needs, balancing factors like initial load time, SEO requirements, and server resources.

SSR and search engines: a match made in HTTP

Server-side rendering can have a big impact on how search engines see your site. Let's break it down:

  1. Faster Indexing

Search engine bots are impatient. They want to see your content NOW. With SSR, your pages are ready to go when the bot comes knocking — no waiting around for JavaScript to load and render.

Search engins for CSR and SSR

  1. Content consistency

SSR ensures that search engines see the same content that users do. With client-side rendering, there's always a risk that the bot might miss some dynamically loaded content.

  1. Improved Load Times

Search engines love fast sites. SSR can significantly cut down initial load times, which could give you a slight edge in rankings.

// Pseudo-code for search engine ranking
function calculateRanking(site) {
  let score = site.relevance;
  if (site.loadTime < FAST_THRESHOLD) {
    score += SPEED_BONUS;
  }
  return score;
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  1. Mobile-First Indexing

With Google's mobile-first indexing, SSR's performance benefits on slower mobile connections become even more important.

  1. Social Media Previews

While not strictly a search engine feature, SSR makes it easier to generate accurate previews when your content is shared on social platforms. This can indirectly boost your SEO by increasing engagement and backlinks.

<!-- SSR makes it easier to include accurate meta tags -->
<meta property="og:title" content="Your Dynamic Title Here">
<meta property="og:description" content="Your Dynamic Description Here">
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

SSR is a powerful tool for SEO, but it's not the only factor. Content quality, relevance, and overall user experience are crucial in search engine rankings. SSR simply ensures that search engines can efficiently crawl and index your content, potentially giving you an edge in visibility and performance metrics.

How to actually do SSR

Implementing SSR doesn't have to be complicated. Let's cover at how to do it using Next.js, a popular React framework that makes SSR straightforward:

  1. Set up a Next.js project.
  2. Create server-side rendered pages.
  3. Let Next.js handle serving the fully rendered HTML and client-side hydration.

Here's a simple Next.js example using the App Router:

// app/page.js
async function getData() {
  const res = await fetch('<https://api.example.com/data>')
  if (!res.ok) {
    throw new Error('Failed to fetch data')
  }
  return res.json()
}

export default async function Home() {
  const data = await getData()

  return <h1>Hello {data.name}</h1>
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In this example:

  • The Home component is an async function, allowing for server-side data fetching.
  • getData() fetches the data we need.
  • The component renders the data directly.

Next.js automatically handles the SSR process:

  1. When a request comes in, Next.js runs this component on the server.
  2. It waits for the data to be fetched.
  3. It renders the component with the fetched data.
  4. The fully rendered HTML is sent to the client.
  5. Once the JavaScript loads in the browser, the page becomes interactive.

This approach gives you the benefits of SSR without having to manually set up a server or manage the rendering process yourself.

Higher-level SSR solutions

If you don't want to reinvent the wheel, there are several frameworks that handle SSR complexities for you. Here's a rundown of popular options across different ecosystems:

collage.png

React

  • Next.js: The most popular React framework with built-in SSR support.
  • Remix: A full stack web framework that leverages React Router.
  • Gatsby: Primarily a static site generator, but also supports SSR.

Vue

  • Nuxt.js: The go-to framework for Vue applications with SSR capabilities.

Angular

  • Angular Universal: The official SSR solution for Angular applications.

Svelte

  • SvelteKit: The official application framework for Svelte with SSR support.

JavaScript (Framework-agnostic)

  • Astro: Allows you to use multiple frameworks and supports SSR.
  • Qwik: A new framework designed for optimal performance with built-in SSR support.

PHP

Ruby

Python

  • Django: Can implement SSR using libraries like Django-Unicorn or HTMX.
  • Flask: Can be configured for SSR, often used with extensions like Flask-SSE.

Each of these frameworks offers its own approach to SSR, often with additional features like static site generation, API routes, and more. The choice depends on your preferred language, ecosystem, and specific project requirements.

Deployment and caching

When deploying an SSR app:

  1. Build both client-side and server-side bundles.
  2. Run the SSR server as a background process.
  3. Use a process monitor like PM2 or Supervisor to keep your server running.

Here's a basic deployment flow:

SSR flowchart.png

Don't forget about caching! Caching server-rendered pages can significantly reduce server load.

SSR with Builder.io

Builder.io provides support for server-side rendering (SSR) and static site generation (SSG) across all components and frameworks. This out-of-the-box functionality allows you to leverage the benefits of SSR and SSG without additional setup.

Builder.io SSR and SSG

Key features

  1. Framework Agnostic: Builder.io works with various frameworks that support SSR and SSG.
  2. Automatic Optimization: Builder optimizes your content for performance, including code splitting and lazy loading of off-screen components.
  3. Dynamic Rendering: You can render different content based on user attributes or A/B tests while maintaining SEO benefits.
  4. Easy Integration: Builder provides SDKs and documentation to seamlessly integrate your existing projects.

Implementation example

Here's a basic example of how you might fetch and render content server-side with Builder and Next.js:

import { builder, BuilderComponent } from '@builder.io/react'

builder.init('YOUR_API_KEY')

export async function getStaticProps({ params }) {
  const page = await builder
    .get('page', {
      userAttributes: {
        urlPath: '/' + (params?.page?.join('/') || '')
      }
    })
    .toPromise()

  return {
    props: {
      page: page || null,
    },
    revalidate: 5
  }
}

export default function Page({ page }) {
  return (
    <BuilderComponent
      model="page"
      content={page}
    />
  )
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Best practices

  1. Ensure you're using a framework that supports SSR or SSG.
  2. Follow your framework's guidelines for fetching data server-side when integrating Builder Pages or Sections.
  3. Refer to the getAsyncProps README for more information on handling server-side data.

By leveraging Builder for SSR, you can combine the flexibility of a headless CMS with the performance benefits of server-side rendering, all while maintaining an easy-to-use visual editing experience.

Wrapping up

Server-side rendering (SSR) is a powerful approach in web development that can significantly enhance your application's performance, SEO, and user experience. Throughout this article, we've explored what SSR is, how it differs from client-side rendering, its impact on search engines, and practical implementation strategies using popular frameworks like Next.js.

We've also discussed the concept of fully rendered pages and examined various SSR solutions across different ecosystems. While SSR offers many benefits, it's important to consider your project's specific needs when deciding whether to implement it.

FAQ

Q: How does SSR affect my development workflow?

A: SSR can make development more complex, as you need to consider both server and client environments. You might need to adjust your build process and be cautious with browser-specific APIs.

Q: How does SSR impact my site's Time to Interactive (TTI)

A: While SSR can improve initial content visibility, it might slightly delay TTI as the browser needs to load and hydrate the JavaScript after receiving the initial HTML.

Q: Are there any security considerations specific to SSR?

A: Yes, with SSR, you need to be more careful about exposing sensitive data or APIs on the server side. Always sanitize user inputs and be cautious about what data you include in the initial render.

Q: How does SSR work with authentication and personalized content?

A: SSR can work with authentication, but it requires careful handling. You might need to implement techniques like JWT tokens or server-side sessions to manage authenticated SSR requests.

Top comments (2)

Collapse
 
loveliberty profile image
Love Liberty •

Some 20 or 25 years ago I created a database driven website for storing management documents & delivering them to lawyers. It used PHP (no JavaScript) and fully rendered the pages using PHP which delivered the webpage HTML using echo. It could change the page style on a click of a link & deliver the content as HTML or PDF. It used templates with numbered sections & code that replaced the markers with the content. This made it possible to change the style of the page by selecting a different template & also to place content in different divs if needed. It used crude old tables for page layout.

It is definitely possible to do it with PHP, and it does have the other advantages of being less easy to copy your code or hack it.

Collapse
 
brandon_kanaday profile image
Brandon Kanaday •

Wow, your articles are incredibly insightful! The way you broke down the concepts and explained the process was both clear and engaging-definitely learned something new today.
If you're open to it, I'd love to collaborate on a related project or exchange ideas on how we can further enhance this approach!

Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.

Read next

felix_kagecha_dfabd365a01 profile image

SEMANTIC HTML AND ACCESIBILITY

felix kagecha -

syakirurahman profile image

11+ Best Open-source Web Analytics, Alternatives to Google Analytics 🚀

Syakir -

vikas76 profile image

Top 10 Real-World Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Watch in 2025

Vikas76 -

tomasdevs profile image

Why I Built the "Soo Good" Vegan Burger Website 🌱

Tomas Stveracek -