DEV Community

s
s

Posted on

Answer:

In addition to what visitor said :

The function void emplace_back(Type&& _Val) provided by MSCV10 is non-conforming and redundant because as you noted it is strictly equivalent to push_back(Type&& _Val).

But the real C++0x form of emplace_back is really useful: void emplace_back(Args&&...);

Instead of taking a value_type

Top comments (0)