In addition to what visitor said :
The function void emplace_back(Type&& _Val)
provided by MSCV10 is non-conforming and redundant because as you noted it is strictly equivalent to push_back(Type&& _Val)
.
But the real C++0x form of emplace_back
is really useful: void emplace_back(Args&&...)
;
Instead of taking a value_type
…
Top comments (0)