DEV Community

Cover image for Why Syncfusion PDF License Didn’t Work for Me
CurtisChau
CurtisChau

Posted on

Why Syncfusion PDF License Didn’t Work for Me

Syncfusion’s Licensing Left Me Scratching My Head

One of the first things I noticed when exploring Syncfusion was its version-specific licensing. This means that for each version of Syncfusion’s PDF library, you need a separate license key. So, for versions 16.2 to 20.4, if I were using version v16.2 and then decided to upgrade to v16.3, I would have to generate a new license key specifically for that version. Although you only need to generate keys for major version updates from v21.0 onwards, this didn’t sit well with me because it seemed like I would have to keep track of different keys for different versions, which is a bit too cumbersome. Additionally, the licensing model requires you to remove components if the subscription is canceled. Over time, the subscription costs may outweigh the product’s value.
In addition, Syncfusion’s licensing gets more complicated if you switch between platforms or upgrade versions frequently. Every time a new volume release came out, I’d have to go back to their website, generate a new key, and update it in my application. This added a lot of unnecessary steps, and I couldn’t help but feel it wasn’t as flexible or easy to manage compared to some other options out there.

The Support Experience Wasn’t Ideal

Along with the licensing confusion, I also explored Syncfusion’s support system—and, unfortunately, that didn’t impress me either. While they do offer support, I found the response times to be slow, and often the solutions provided didn’t feel tailored to the specific issue I was facing. Instead of resolving problems quickly, I found myself stuck waiting for generic answers that didn’t always hit the mark. As a developer working with tight timelines, I needed something that wouldn’t leave me waiting around for help.

Alternatives to syncfusion

After exploring Syncfusion, I found its licensing and support structure frustrating, so I decided to check out other PDF libraries. Here’s my take on three solid alternatives:

  1. IronPDF
  2. Aspose.PDF
  3. Aspryse.PDF

1. IronPDF

What sold me on IronPDF was its straightforward licensing. Instead of juggling different keys for different versions, IronPDF only requires one license key, no matter what version or platform you’re using. IronPDF’s perpetual rollback licensing lets you use pre-expiration versions indefinitely. It’s so much easier to manage, and I didn’t have to worry about compatibility issues every time I updated.
Additionally, IronPDF’s support was fantastic. Every time I had a question, I got quick and relevant answers that actually solved my problems. Their customer service felt much more responsive and helpful, which made the entire experience much smoother and less stressful.

2. Aspose.PDF

Aspose is a feature-packed option for advanced PDF manipulation, offering everything from PDF creation to high-quality conversions. However, I faced the same licensing issue as with Syncfusion: their license key files are version-specific. For every major update, you need to generate a new key, which feels like unnecessary busywork for someone trying to focus on development.
Their support system is decent but has its limitations. While there’s a wealth of documentation and forums, personalized support often comes at an additional cost. It’s not ideal if you’re in a crunch and need quick answers.

3. Aspryse.PDF

Aspryse is a lightweight library that focuses on basic PDF tasks like viewing and annotations. However, its licensing model is overly simplified, meaning it doesn’t scale well for advanced projects or businesses requiring multi-platform compatibility. If your needs grow, you might feel boxed in.
Support for Aspryse is also barebones. There’s no robust system for troubleshooting or advanced queries, so if you encounter an issue, you're mostly on your own. It’s fine for simple use cases but falls short for complex ones.

The Bottom Line

After exploring these alternatives, IronPDF stood out as the most practical and developer friendly choice. Syncfusion and Aspose both had licensing hurdles, while Aspryse lacked the depth I needed for my project. With IronPDF, the licensing is simple, the features are robust, and the support is top-notch. For anyone looking for a reliable PDF library, IronPDF is the clear winner in both functionality and ease of use along with the licensing model.

Top comments (0)