on is created for reducing typing
When I'm working with kubectl
, at the most time I would use kubectl get pod
to get all pods then use kubectl exec -ti <pod-name> bash
into the pod to debugging/testing our Router, with it all the days I found it's pretty repeated, and as a software engineer, we hate repeating. So I create a command line tool could execute the command that bases on existing context, that's on
. But I just mention kubectl
, why I create a general CLI? Because I also have to work with other commands such as go
, neutron
, docker
work in the same pattern.
After the background introduction, let's see how it work like:
$ on go
on(go)> test
PASS
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket 0.031s
on(go)> test ./...
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket 0.033s
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/cookie 0.024s
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/fairing 0.018s
? github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/internal/context [no test files]
? github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/internal/filepath [no test files]
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/response 0.024s
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/router 0.013s
on(go)> test ./... -count 1 -cover -failfast
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket 0.041s coverage: 86.5% of statements
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/cookie 0.024s coverage: 100.0% of statements
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/fairing 0.022s coverage: 100.0% of statements
? github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/internal/context [no test files]
? github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/internal/filepath [no test files]
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/response 0.032s coverage: 94.1% of statements
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/router 0.015s coverage: 95.3% of statements
on(go)>
test
test ./...
test ./... -count 1 -cover -failfast
You can see the hint would appear in the prompt box, you could use tab
to select from them.
And you can append new context on to current context by type Ctrl+a
then type the append part, e.g.
on(go)> test
on(go test)> ./...
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket (cached)
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/cookie (cached)
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/fairing (cached)
? github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/internal/context [no test files]
? github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/internal/filepath [no test files]
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/response (cached)
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket/router (cached)
on(go test)>
ok github.com/dannypsnl/rocket (cached)
on(go test)
./...
As you see, the prompt would change for a different context. Then you can use Ctrl+c
to delete the last element from the context to back. And the prompt would change back too, e.g.
on(go test)>
on(go)>
test
test ./...
test ./... -count 1 -cover -failfast
Everything looks good, but not just that, on
won't try to store a failed command into prompts, so it won't be too annoying.
And on
could let you run a shell inside of it, e.g.
$ on kubectl
on(kubectl)> get po
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
alpine-deploy-5694b87b56-2gscz 1/1 Running 0 11h
alpine-deploy-5694b87b56-xnwl2 1/1 Running 0 11h
on(kubectl)> exec -ti alpine-deploy-5694b87b56-2gscz bash
bash-4.4# ls -la
total 64
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Mar 29 16:11 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Mar 29 16:11 ..
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Mar 29 16:11 .dockerenv
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Mar 29 16:11 bin
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 360 Mar 29 16:11 dev
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Mar 29 16:11 etc
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 4 15:43 home
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Mar 29 16:11 lib
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Mar 4 15:43 media
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 4 15:43 mnt
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 4 15:43 opt
dr-xr-xr-x 224 root root 0 Mar 29 16:11 proc
drwx------ 1 root root 4096 Mar 29 16:11 root
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Mar 29 16:11 run
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 4 15:43 sbin
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 4 15:43 srv
dr-xr-xr-x 13 root root 0 Mar 29 16:09 sys
drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 4096 Mar 4 15:43 tmp
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Mar 29 16:11 usr
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Mar 4 15:43 var
bash-4.4# exit
exit
on(kubectl)>
After you have done your job, just typed Ctrl-d
then you could leave on
Thanks for taking a look, and I only test the command in MacOS with iTerm2, so I would like to know the result on others platform :)
Top comments (0)