When building cross-platform apps, developers often face a choice between .NET MAUI and Avalonia. These frameworks offer distinct advantages, histories, and use cases. Here’s a deep dive into their stories and how to decide which one suits your project.
The Story Behind .NET MAUI and Avalonia
Let’s dive into their features, histories, and use cases to see how they stack up against each other.
The Birth of .NET MAUI
.NET MAUI (Multi-platform App UI) traces its roots to Xamarin, founded in 2011. Xamarin aimed to simplify mobile app development, enabling developers to use C# to write apps for both iOS and Android. Microsoft acquired Xamarin in 2016, integrating it into the .NET ecosystem.
The release of .NET Core in 2016 unified the fragmented .NET landscape, culminating in .NET 5. This unification, along with Xamarin’s capabilities, led to the launch of .NET MAUI in 2020 as part of .NET 6. Its mission: provide a single-project solution for apps on Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, deeply tied to Microsoft’s development tools and cloud services.
Avalonia’s Open-Source Roots
Launched in 2013, Avalonia is a community-driven, open-source UI framework inspired by WPF (Windows Presentation Foundation). It was designed to modernize desktop development while supporting Windows, macOS, Linux, and embedded platforms.
Avalonia emphasizes a lightweight and customizable approach, perfect for high-performance desktop applications. Its open governance model allows developers to tailor it to their needs, making it an excellent alternative to proprietary tools.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | .NET MAUI | Avalonia |
|---|---|---|
| Target Platforms | Mobile (iOS, Android), Desktop (Windows, macOS) | Desktop (Windows, macOS, Linux), Embedded |
| UI Language | XAML | XAML-like syntax |
| Performance | Optimized for native mobile apps | Optimized for desktop and embedded systems |
| Open Source | Partially (Microsoft-led) | Fully open-source |
| Use Cases | Consumer-facing mobile and desktop apps | Enterprise desktop apps, embedded systems |
Advantages and Disadvantages
.NET MAUI
Advantages:
- Seamless integration with Visual Studio and the Microsoft ecosystem.
- Mobile-first design with native controls for Android and iOS.
- Simplified single-project architecture for cross-platform apps.
Disadvantages:
- Limited support for Linux.
- Relies heavily on Microsoft’s development roadmap.
Avalonia
Advantages:
- Lightweight and efficient, suitable for older hardware.
- Fully open-source with an active community.
- Native Linux support and excellent for embedded systems.
Disadvantages:
- Not optimized for mobile platforms.
- Smaller ecosystem compared to .NET MAUI.
When to Choose What?
- .NET MAUI: Perfect for apps targeting mobile platforms or when using Microsoft tools like Azure and Visual Studio.
- Avalonia: Ideal for desktop-centric or Linux-based projects, or when you need complete control over the UI.
Fun Fact
Did you know the name "Avalonia" for the open-source UI framework actually traces its roots back to an early internal Microsoft project? Originally, Microsoft's WPF (Windows Presentation Foundation) was code-named "Avalon." When developers behind Avalonia chose their name, they were drawing on that legacy, while signaling a shift toward a more open and cross-platform framework. So, while WPF stayed tied to Windows, Avalonia aimed for broader horizons, bringing the legacy of Avalon to a whole new level of flexibility and accessibility
Conclusion
.NET MAUI and Avalonia are powerful frameworks, but they shine in different areas. Choose .NET MAUI for mobile-focused or Microsoft-integrated solutions, and opt for Avalonia when building desktop-first apps or projects requiring Linux and embedded system support.
Let’s discuss in the comments! 🚀
Top comments (2)
Name comes from wpf that had codename Avalon
Which framework do you prefer for your next project?