Though seemingly distinct, the Cynefin Framework and Bill Eckstrom’s Model of Growth and Complexity share a common foundation. These models provide valuable insights into how individuals and organizations adapt to change and navigate complex environments. In this blog post, we will explore the connection between these models, investigate their scientific origins, and discuss their implications for understanding growth and complexity in various domains.
A complex network of mushrooms growing on the asphalt
The Cynefin Framework: An Overview
The Cynefin Framework, developed by Dave Snowden, is a decision-making framework designed to help individuals and organizations navigate complex situations. This model comprises five domains: simple, complicated, complex, chaotic, and disorder. Each domain represents a different type of problem or environment, requiring unique approaches and strategies to tackle the challenges effectively.
Bill Eckstrom’s Model of Growth and Complexity
Bill Eckstrom’s Model of Growth and Complexity highlights the relationship between growth, comfort, and complexity. According to Eckstrom, individuals and organizations experience the most significant growth when they move out of their comfort zones and embrace complexity. This model emphasizes the importance of continuous learning, adaptation, and innovation in ever-changing environments and challenges.
Unravelling the Connection
If you look closer, the Cynefin Framework and Bill Eckstrom’s Model of Growth and Complexity reveal a shared foundation in understanding the relationship between complexity and growth based on your decisions in each complexity domain. Both models stress the importance of adapting to various environments and challenges and recognizing that different situations require unique approaches and strategies. By acknowledging this connection, we can appreciate that these models represent a genuine, universal concept, not just someone’s opinion.
It proves they were discovered, not invented.
The Scientific Origins
The Cynefin Framework was developed based on research in complex adaptive systems, cognitive science, anthropology, and organizational behaviour. While it may not have originated from a specific scientific paper, its foundations are deeply rooted in established scientific disciplines.
Bill Eckstrom’s Model of Growth and Complexity stems from his experience in sales leadership and personal growth. Although it may not have direct roots in a scientific paper, its concepts resonate with well-established growth and development theories, such as the Zone of Proximal Development and Flow.
Given the connections between these models and established scientific theories, we should clearly recognize the value and legitimacy of both the Cynefin Framework and Bill Eckstrom’s Model of Growth and Complexity.
Embracing Complexity for Growth
By understanding the connection between the Cynefin Framework and Bill Eckstrom’s Model of Growth and Complexity, we can appreciate the value of embracing complexity and continuously adapting to new challenges. Both models provide valuable insights into navigating change and complexity in various domains, and their roots in established scientific disciplines reinforce their legitimacy. We can foster growth, innovation, and adaptability in an increasingly complex world by applying these models to our personal and professional lives.
At the end of the day, it's amazing to find two people discovering apparent different concepts representing the same fundamentals.
Thanks for reading. If you have feedback, contact me on Twitter, LinkedIn or Github.
Top comments (0)