Validating a software for its stability and efficiency is essential to maintain customer satisfaction and prevent significant revenue losses. Moreover, in today’s fast-paced and highly competitive software development landscape, quality assurance is more critical than ever. Of myriad testing modules, smoke tests and sanity tests are two types of software testing that are designed to catch issues early in the development process before they become more significant and costly problems.
Although being used on a regular basis, these two terms have collected some misconceptions around them. It is essential to understand these testing methodologies and thus know the difference between them.
Let’s dive in!
What is Smoke Testing?
Smoke testing is a critical step in the software testing process that helps to identify critical issues and ensure the stability of the application. It verifies the most crucial functionalities and provides a quick and high-level overview of the software's functionality. By detecting major defects early on, it saves a lot of time and effort for the development team and helps prevent delays or failures later in the development cycle.
Performing smoke tests manually or with automation tools is a common practice, and after passing the smoke test, the development team moves on to more comprehensive testing.
What is Sanity Testing?
Sanity testing is a crucial type of software testing that quickly verifies if newly added functionalities or changes have not negatively affected the critical functionalities of the application. It is cost-effective, catches potential problems early, and enhances user satisfaction by ensuring the quality and reliability of the software.
The testing involves manual or automated testing of essential functionalities, including login, search, and payment functionality, to ensure they are still working correctly. Sanity testing is performed before comprehensive testing to catch any potential issues quickly.
Read detailed comparison here: https://bit.ly/3FQpzP1
Top comments (0)