DEV Community

Hamdi KHELIL
Hamdi KHELIL

Posted on

Upgrading AKS: In-Place, Blue-Green, and Canary Upgrades Explained ๐Ÿš€

Keeping your Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cluster up to date is crucial for security, performance, and accessing new features. AKS offers different strategies for upgrading, and in this guide, weโ€™ll walk through the main methods: In-place upgrades, Blue-Green deployments, and Canary upgrades, complete with real-world examples to help you understand the process!

Types of AKS Upgrades ๐Ÿšง

1. In-Place Upgrades ๐Ÿ”„

An In-place upgrade is the most straightforward method, where the upgrade happens directly on your current AKS cluster. It updates the control plane and worker nodes without creating new resources.

Example:

Youโ€™re running a blog platform ๐Ÿ“š and need to upgrade to the latest Kubernetes version for better performance. With an in-place upgrade, AKS will:

  • First, upgrade the control plane.
  • Then, upgrade the worker nodes one by one, ensuring that the workloads continue to run with minimal impact.

Benefits:

  • Simple: You initiate the upgrade with minimal effort.
  • Cost-effective: No extra resources are needed.
  • Automated rollback: AKS handles rollback if something goes wrong.

Drawbacks:

  • Possible downtime: Some services might experience downtime during the node upgrades.
  • Risk: If something goes wrong during the upgrade, it could impact the entire cluster.

2. Blue-Green Deployment ๐Ÿ”ต๐ŸŸข

A Blue-Green deployment involves creating a second environment where you upgrade and test your changes before switching over. The old environment (blue) stays live until youโ€™re ready to switch traffic to the new one (green).

Example:

Letโ€™s say youโ€™re running an e-commerce platform ๐Ÿ›’ where downtime is not an option. In a Blue-Green deployment:

  1. You create a new AKS cluster (green) and deploy the updated version.
  2. You test it, ensuring everything works as expected.
  3. You then shift traffic from the blue (old) environment to the green (new) environment.
  4. If anything goes wrong, you can easily switch back to the blue environment.

Benefits:

  • Zero downtime: The blue environment stays live until the green environment is fully ready.
  • Safe rollbacks: Easily switch back if something goes wrong.
  • Comprehensive testing: Test your changes thoroughly in the green environment.

Drawbacks:

  • Double the resources: Running two environments doubles your costs.
  • Complexity: You need to manage routing between the two environments and handle any synchronization for stateful apps.

3. Canary Upgrades ๐Ÿฆ

A Canary upgrade involves upgrading a small portion of your cluster first (canary nodes), allowing you to monitor how the new version performs with minimal impact. If it works fine, the upgrade is gradually rolled out to the rest of the cluster.

Example:

Letโ€™s say youโ€™re managing a video streaming service ๐ŸŽฅ. To avoid any widespread issues during an upgrade, you:

  1. Upgrade only a small subset of nodes first.
  2. Route a small portion of traffic to those nodes and observe how they perform.
  3. If everything looks good, continue upgrading the remaining nodes.

Benefits:

  • Low risk: The new version is tested with a small portion of traffic first.
  • Progressive rollout: You can slowly increase the number of upgraded nodes.
  • Quick rollback: You can revert changes easily if something goes wrong with the canary nodes.

Drawbacks:

  • Longer upgrade process: It takes more time to upgrade the entire cluster.
  • Operational overhead: You need to manage traffic splitting between the old and new versions.

Comparing the AKS Upgrade Strategies ๐Ÿค”

Upgrade Type Zero Downtime Risk Level Resource Usage Rollback Ease Complexity
In-place โŒ No โš ๏ธ Moderate ๐Ÿ’ฐ Low โช Automatic ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Low
Blue-Green โœ… Yes ๐Ÿ”’ Low ๐Ÿ’ธ High ๐Ÿ‘Œ Easy ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ High
Canary โœ… Partial ๐Ÿ”’ Low โš–๏ธ Moderate ๐Ÿ‘ Easy ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Moderate

Which Upgrade Strategy Should You Choose? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ

  • In-place upgrades are great for smaller or non-critical applications where minor downtime is acceptable. Itโ€™s simple, fast, and budget-friendly.
  • Blue-Green deployments work best for mission-critical apps that need zero downtime. The extra cost and complexity are justified when availability is crucial.
  • Canary upgrades are ideal for more complex setups where you want to gradually roll out changes to minimize risks. It offers a balance between safety and operational efficiency.

Final Thoughts ๐Ÿง 

Upgrading AKS clusters doesnโ€™t have to be a headache! Whether you opt for in-place, blue-green, or canary, thereโ€™s a solution that fits your needs. Use these strategies to ensure a smooth, reliable upgrade process for your AKS clusters while keeping your apps running without a hitch. ๐Ÿ˜Š

Happy clustering !

Top comments (0)