DEV Community

Cover image for Bulma - The Most Underrated Framework of the CSS Framework Era
Aashir Khan
Aashir Khan

Posted on • Updated on • Originally published at justaashir.com

Bulma vs Bootstrap Bulma - The Most Underrated Framework of the CSS Framework Era

Everyone was using a CSS Framework to simplify their work and save their time, Bootstrap was and is King Right Now of the Frameworks Market. Every Institute, Almost Every Tutorial on YouTube was using Bootstrap, Developers were not learning Fundamentals of CSS and using Bootstrap. I was also a beginner at that time, I learned HTML and CSS from W3schools and Lynda. Then I used a lot of floats to make web pages, and kinda like the way.


Responsive Design was my next goal, so CSS Framework was the Easiest way for Responsiveness, I tried to read docs and watched Bootstrap Videos but Bootstrap terrified me with lots of classes and inconvenient naming, and I didn't like to use bootstrap cause I think every website using Bootstrap looks quite similar it also applies styles on element as defaults, I tried two or more times but didn't get Bootstrap in my mind, so I found some alternatives like Foundation and Material, but they were just like Bootstrap. I just wanted to make my site Responsive, and then I found the video of Brad Traversy Skeleton CSS


I loved Skeleton CSS but now their devs are not updating it, its not based on CSS grid or Flexbox. There were some confusions in it, and then I found Bulma , I was just using YouTube as usual and then I came to Bulma.css Tutorial Video tagged โ€œThe Easiest Framework You can learn in 20 minutesโ€, Hmm I watched it and it really changed my life, It was really the easiest framework, even you don't have to remember the classes and there are some of the advantages :

  • No default Styling
  • Powerful Flexbox Grid
  • Small Size in Kbs
  • Reusable and You can modify Sass
  • No Javascript only CSS
  • Reusable Components

I am Kinda Obsessed with Bulma(I think) But You can give it a try.
This is my First Post BTW, You can Follow me on Twitter ๐Ÿ˜‰ https://www.twitter.com/justaashir

Top comments (55)

Collapse
 
devnamednick profile image
Nick Kaufmann

I agree that Bulma is worth a try. While Bootstrap is the most "pushed" framework, I think the "kitchen-sink" concept should not be relied upon heavily for times when you only need a faucet. I like that you point out how the work flow for new developers is "backwards" in learning core CSS values after taking on a framework like Bootstrap. In my opinion, communities can be too quick to offer frameworks as a solution before individuals even understand why these frameworks were created in the first place. Nice article.

Collapse
 
justaashir profile image
Aashir Khan • Edited

This guy just summarized my entire article.

Collapse
 
peterdkc profile image
Peter DeMarco

My go tos are Bulma for company internal sites that need a lot of boilerplate form and table CRUD stuff; Tailwind for anything public facing that needs a unique design or just needs to look interesting. Both are significantly faster and easier to use than Bootstrap.

Collapse
 
spascareli profile image
Sergio Pascareli

How does Bulma compare to Bootstrap in terms of features?
My use would be for internal company sites as well, where "no js" or "smaller size" doesn't make too much difference, but developer speed does.

Collapse
 
peterdkc profile image
Peter DeMarco

I mean probably a lot smaller feature set but the point on those kinds of sites is that you can make do with very little compared to public sites. I'd give the docs a read and see if you think it has what you need. Definitely much faster to use, less markup, less futzing. Just drop in the example code and roll.

Collapse
 
justaashir profile image
Aashir Khan

That's my point.

Collapse
 
sm0ke profile image
Sm0ke • Edited

Hello @amir ,
Good article, thank you!
Bulma has the potential to grow, IMO. Also, Tailwind looks promising.

CSS Framework 2019 Survey Results -  Published on WpTavern.com

2019 Survey Results - Published on WpTavern

For new projects, I'm using Bulma (Sorry Bootstrap), and prototype pages using two resources:

A real problem is to find some nice templates to start fast a new project, only a few available on ThemeForest & related markets.

Happy (CSS) Styling & Coding!

Collapse
 
vikdiesel profile image
Viktor Kuzhelny

Here are couple of free Bulma Admin Dashboard templates built with Vue.js & Buefy

github.com/vikdiesel/admin-one-vue...

Vue Bulma Admin Dashboard

github.com/vikdiesel/admin-two-vue...

Vue Bulma Admin Dashboard

Collapse
 
_juliettech profile image
juliette_chevalier

Do you happen to have a source for this graph/survey? Very interesting intel ๐Ÿ”ฅ

Collapse
 
sm0ke profile image
Sm0ke • Edited

Hello Juliette,
The survey was published here - Full credit to WpTavern

Collapse
 
justaashir profile image
Aashir Khan

It's Awesome

Collapse
 
zolodeveloper profile image
JULIUS SOLOMON

Use bulkit cssninja UI kit

Collapse
 
fmp777 profile image
William

I agree Bulma is great! I love it so much been rebuilding Bootstrap into Bulma over time. I've tinkered with Tailwind, and I can see its allure, but honestly, I love clean code and tailwind produces absolute madness in html. I feel like I would have to make an IDE to cleanup tailwind mess so i can see my html again. I prefer a somewhat opinionated CSS Framework, whereas with tailwind, I feel like I should just write my own CSS for a more organized approach.

I totally understand why Tailwind is on the rise, but its Bulma that has my heart now

Collapse
 
justaashir profile image
Aashir Khan

Haha, I'm the author here :)
I broke up with bulma, since mid 2020 I think and joined the tailwind boat. It's addictive, I can't imagine things I built with it. I couldn't have built it with bulma or custom css (it would've been too much media queries and css e.t.c)

But I've been with bulma for 2 years, and It was an awesome time.

Collapse
 
justaashir profile image
Aashir Khan

Of course ๐Ÿ˜Š TailwindCSS is too good to not to ignore

Collapse
 
tomearly profile image
Tom Early

I use Buefy which is Bulma based for Vue. It is great :-)

Collapse
 
justaashir profile image
Aashir Khan

Keep Using What you like , not what others are using

Collapse
 
momin profile image
Md Abdul Momin

Bootstrap 4+ is unbeatable for the last 4 years!

Collapse
 
justaashir profile image
Aashir Khan

I really agree with you! But if a person only want grid system and not the other things? as defaults??

Collapse
 
joluga profile image
joluga

If you only want grid, just use CSS Grid. No javascript or any framework needed nor required.

Collapse
 
momin profile image
Md Abdul Momin

Yes! If I want to choose only grid, I can pull only grid from bootstrap!

Thread Thread
 
justaashir profile image
Aashir Khan

Then It will be really great ๐Ÿ˜Š , I have some bad experience with Bootstrap though. As So I wrote this post

Thread Thread
 
ptejada profile image
Pablo Tejada

With sass you can only pull the components that you need. Also the global style reset is great, it does wonders for cross browser comparability.

Collapse
 
coisox profile image
Aizal Manan

Bulma is good; got datepicker, timepicker, datetimepicker (which super hard to find on other framework). My only problem with Bulma is the documentation.

For example, does Bulma offer something like "pt-0"? How to search the documentation? I have to use google to search for specific component features. Sometimes I search inside the "bulma.css" to know whether I should introduce my own class or can reuse existing class.

Unlike Bootstrap with its fast build in search (and keyword friendly too). So at the end, what makes a framework good is its documentation and tons of external tutorial or samples.

Collapse
 
justaashir profile image
Aashir Khan

Hi, Aizal... You're absolutely correct.

Time changes, as opinions, I wrote this post 6 months ago and since then I've used Bulma a lot, and when you use it a lot, you will start finding the complications and I found a lot of downsides including padding-margin utilities and there is little to no documentation on making 'title' 'subtitle' or many other classes responsive. There are lots of other things as well that made me hate Bulma a lot.

I just tried TailwindCSS and It's super-perfect, for everything... I regret that I used Bulma for our SaSS application that ended being a mess of custom SCSS with margin-padding functions and media queries.

It made me compromise with my creativity, So I highly un-recommend Bulma now.

Check the TailwindCSS pen here, I can't imagine creating it with Bulma: codepen.io/justaashir/pen/mdeeKbz

Collapse
 
sym profile image
Ryan Carter

Excellent first post! I hope you will write many more. I have used bulma a bunch, and like it, but I've been using purecss.io more lately. I also tried it tachyons as well. So many good options these days.

Collapse
 
gklijs profile image
Gerard Klijs

I needed some css framework a few years ago. Did some research and start using Bulma. Really like it, especially since JavaScript is optional, making it very easy to use with clojurescript. The use is probably growing, but as long as it's not included in one of the major frameworks the use stays limited compared to bootstrap probably. Not sure if that's either good or bad for Bulma users.