DEV Community

Cover image for Building a Nickname-Based Crypto Transfer Service Like WhiteBIT's QuickSend: A Developer's Guide
Kaan Kaya
Kaan Kaya

Posted on

Building a Nickname-Based Crypto Transfer Service Like WhiteBIT's QuickSend: A Developer's Guide

In the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency exchanges, WhiteBIT has introduced a groundbreaking feature called QuickSend. It simplifies crypto transfers by allowing users to send funds using only a recipient's nickname, bypassing the need for long and error-prone wallet addresses. From a user perspective, this is a massive UX improvement, but what does it take to implement such a system from the developer's point of view? Let’s dive into how you can create a similar feature, the technical requirements, and the potential challenges.

How QuickSend Works
At its core, QuickSend works by associating user nicknames with their crypto wallet addresses. Instead of copying and pasting long alphanumeric wallet strings, users simply input a unique nickname to send funds.

From a backend perspective, the system performs these core tasks:

  1. Nickname Lookup: Resolve a nickname to a verified wallet address.
  2. Transaction Validation: Validate user inputs and ensure the sender has sufficient funds.
  3. Crypto Transfer: Initiate the transfer on the blockchain.
  4. Security Checks: Prevent fraud, phishing, or nickname hijacking.

Key Components to Build a Similar Service
Here’s a breakdown of the technical stack and architecture you need to develop a similar feature:

  1. User Management and Nickname Registry
  • A database (like PostgreSQL, MySQL, or MongoDB) to store and manage user accounts, wallet addresses, and unique nicknames.
  • Nicknames must be unique across the system. This can be enforced via a unique constraint in the database schema:

Image description

  • A nickname resolution API: When a user enters a nickname, the system queries the database to retrieve the associated wallet address.

2. Blockchain Integration

  • Use libraries such as web3.js (Ethereum-based networks) or BitcoinJS (for Bitcoin) to interact with the blockchain.
  • Example for Ethereum transfer using web3.js:

Image description

  • Consider building abstraction layers to handle multiple cryptocurrencies (e.g., Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana) by integrating with their respective SDKs or blockchain nodes.

3. Front-End Development

  • Design a clean and intuitive UI for nickname-based transfers:
  • A nickname input field.
  • Validation messages for nonexistent nicknames.
  • Real-time balance checks for the sender.
  • Use modern frameworks like React, Vue, or Flutter for a seamless user experience. Example of a React form for QuickSend:

Image description

4. Security Measures

  • Authentication: Use OAuth, JWT, or sessions to secure user accounts.
  • Rate Limiting: Prevent abuse with tools like Nginx or libraries like express-rate-limit for Node.js.
  • Encryption: Ensure sensitive data like wallet addresses and private keys are encrypted in transit (HTTPS) and at rest.
  • Nickname Validation: Prevent fake nicknames by enforcing alphanumeric patterns and length restrictions.

Challenges in Development
While the concept of a nickname-based transfer system sounds straightforward, several challenges arise during implementation:

  1. Ensuring Uniqueness: A robust mechanism is required to ensure that nicknames are unique globally and cannot be easily hijacked.
  2. Scalability: The nickname lookup service should handle thousands of requests per second without performance degradation.
  3. Blockchain Delays: Transfers rely on blockchain confirmations, which can introduce delays. Solutions like Layer-2 scaling or instant confirmations (e.g., Lightning Network for Bitcoin) can improve speed.
  4. User Errors: Mistyping nicknames can result in failed or incorrect transfers. Consider introducing nickname suggestions or validation prompts to reduce errors.
  5. Security Risks: Protect the system against potential attacks, such as:
  • Phishing attempts.
  • Database breaches.
  • Fake nickname registration (e.g., impersonating known users).

Is It Easy or Hard to Implement?
From a development standpoint:

  • Easy Parts: Creating the database schema, nickname resolution APIs, and front-end UI is relatively straightforward.
  • Harder Parts: Integrating with multiple blockchains and ensuring robust security measures require in-depth knowledge and testing.

Fortunately, the development process can be streamlined with existing tools:

  • Web3 Providers: Services like Infura or Alchemy simplify blockchain interaction.
  • SDKs: Use cryptocurrency SDKs to reduce complexity.
  • Cloud Infrastructure: Deploy APIs and databases on scalable platforms like AWS, Azure, or GCP.

For a MVP (Minimum Viable Product), you can start with a single blockchain like Ethereum, build a nickname registry, and add user authentication.

Conclusion
Creating a feature like QuickSend is an exciting challenge that improves the cryptocurrency transfer experience dramatically. While the nickname-based system simplifies UX, developers need to focus on scalability, security, and blockchain integration.

With the right tools and approach, building a similar service is highly achievable, even for a small development team. Start small, prioritize security, and scale gradually to provide users with a fast, simple, and secure crypto transfer experience.

If you're looking for a practical way to stand out in the blockchain space, this is definitely a feature worth implementing. πŸš€

Top comments (0)