If you develop with JavaScript you likely use functions fairly often. And, because you're a developer, you've likely made some mistakes.
For me, it was last week. I called a function without parentheses and it didn't exactly do what I wanted. But why? Why was that a mistake? In React there are lots of times we use functions without parentheses and everything works just fine!
Today we're going to talk about why.
How do parantheses impact functions
Let's start with a typical function.
const someString = () => {
return 'some string'
}
If we wanted to call this function, we'd do so like this.
const result = someString()
// result is now "some string"
But what happens if we do this?
const result = someString
result
is now equal to [Function: someString]
. It's a reference to the function rather than the result of evaluating the function.
Well that was a quick post. Always use parentheses, problem solved.
Not so fast!
React and functions
Sometimes in React we want to execute a function. But other times, we want to pass around a reference.
const ExampleComponent = () => {
const clickHandler = () => {
console.log('I was clicked')
}
return <button onClick={clickHandler}>Click me</button>
}
onClick
is an event handler which takes a function as a callback. So it needs a reference to the function it's going to call.
What happens if we add parantheses? Will it still work?
const ExampleComponent = () => {
const clickHandler = () => {
console.log('I was clicked')
}
return <button onClick={clickHandler()}>Click me</button>
}
Nope! Nothing will get logged. The event handler was expecting a function that it can call. However, it got the return value of the function.
Any other syntax weirdness we should talk about? Sure, why not!
Parameters
By default, event
is passed as an argument to the callback function. Something like this.
const ExampleComponent = () => {
const clickHandler = event => {
event.preventDefault()
console.log('I was clicked')
}
return <button onClick={clickHandler}>Click me</button>
}
This actually introduces an interesting detail! The code above is equivalent to the code below, passing our function wrapped in an anonymous function that exposes event
.
const ExampleComponent = () => {
const clickHandler = event => {
event.preventDefault()
console.log('I was clicked')
}
return <button onClick={event => clickHandler(event)}>Click me</button>
}
Anonymous functions
As it turns out, we can define our function inline.
const ExampleComponent = () => (
<button onClick={() => console.log('I was clicked')}>Click me</button>
)
This also gives us the opportunity to pass our own parameters.
const ExampleComponent = () => {
const clickHandler = message => {
console.log(message)
}
return <button onClick={() => clickHandler('I was clicked')}>Click me</button>
}
But what if we want the event object in addition to our other parameter(s)?
const ExampleComponent = () => {
const clickHandler = message => event => {
event.preventDefault()
console.log(message)
}
return <button onClick={clickHandler('I was clicked')}>Click me</button>
}
This makes sense if we think about what we already know. That event
is always passed, whether we reference it or not.
I'm a little confused
If that last example confused you, that's ok! It looks a lot like our earlier example where we passed the result of a function rather than a reference to it.
The trick is to look at the definition of clickHandler
a little bit closer. We'll make it a bit more verbose to make that easier.
const clickHandler = message => {
return event => {
event.preventDefault()
console.log(message)
}
}
The "result" of clickHandler is a function! It returns a reference to a function. So we're all good.
Functions are fun
I know that was a lot of syntax, but I hope you feel a bit more confident. Knowing what is happening under the hood can turn guess and check errors into intentional fixes. You'll still make mistakes, we all do, but maybe you'll catch them faster.
Top comments (9)
Nice article! Couple of nitpicks, though:
"I was clicked" will get logged each time the component is rendered, but nothing will be logged when the button is clicked. If a function is called, its side effects will still happen, even if it's called in an unintended way.
onClick
receivedundefined
, not the string "I was clicked", becauseclickHandler
doesn't return anything (implicitly returnsundefined
):The point of the first piece is that nothing will get logged when the button is clicked because weāre talking about the behavior of the click handler. Discussing what happens when the component renders is outside the scope of the conversation.
The second example is a bit confusing. I wanted to match what happens if you execute that same thing in node and what response you see so that people can run it themselves, but itās not a 1:1 mapping.
Yeah you'll get the logging output, but that's not the same as the return value. The return value is always
undefined
unless a) an explicitreturn
statement is used to return something other than undefined, or b) it's a single-statement arrow function with no enclosing block:In the case of
console.log
, even if youreturn console.log('...')
, the return value will still beundefined
, becauseconsole.log
itself returnsundefined
.Sorry if I'm stating the obvious or my explanation is confusing.
I have to admit I find it odd that you start with a "typical function":
when that is bizzaro to me and not typical. Sure I see it a fair bit nowadays, it's not rare per se, but it is still distinctly a neologism and maybe it's old school but this is a typical function:
Which, hey, is reminiscent of the banner image ;-).
One of the most fun things about functions though that you've missed IMHO is the loss of
this
, most especially in event handlers. It's also not uncommon to use classes as a means of encapsulating and isolating closely related code. And when your event handlers are methods of a class or functions inside of methods even,this
becomes a fairly hefty issue.To wit, we commonly see
.bind(this)
which is one of Javascript's painful little idiosyncrasies šthe last example is called currying function.
using with shorthand - a reference to function saves memory but this is unclean and a bit hard to debug when we use currying function
nice
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments. Some comments have been hidden by the post's author - find out more