DEV Community

Cover image for Reducing Motion to Improve Accessibility
Lindsey Kopacz
Lindsey Kopacz

Posted on • Originally published at a11ywithlindsey.com

Reducing Motion to Improve Accessibility

Originally posted on a11ywithlindsey.com.

Hey friends! In this post, I am going to walk you through a newer media query (to me): prefers-reduced-motion.

Quick confession: I know CSS fundamentals, but I am pretty behind on all the new stuff that has been coming out. Because my focus is usually on accessibility, I am focusing far more on HTML and JavaScript. When I focus on CSS, it's ensuring proper color contrast or custom focus states. Sometimes I use CSS to make checkboxes keyboard accessible. I always associated media queries with responsive design. I never thought of media queries as an accessibility enhancement.

In this post, we are updating my blog by:

  1. Adding the prefers-reduced-motion query
  2. Adding a user-controlled setting for reducing motion.

Understanding prefers-reduced-motion

Animations, zooming, and panning can be problematic for people who have vestibular disorders. These disorders can cause motion sickness and vertigo. These are uncomfortable feelings that you don't want to deal with ever, let alone on a website. From what I understand, the vestibular system is in your inner ear and helps to control balance.

According to vestibular.org, up to 35% of adults aged 40 years or older in the United States have experienced some form of vestibular dysfunction. So this is not a small problem.

My major takeaways from the web accessibility perspective:

  1. Be careful with your animations.
  2. Be careful with your gifs.
  3. Use prefers-reduced-motion.
  4. Allow a user to control reduce motion.

How you do it

Implementing the query is pretty simple:

@media screen and (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
  /* Reduced Motion Code */
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

There are a few places I have some animations for my links.

First, there are my links where I have a border-bottom that moves down when you hover over it.

Then there is my call to action link that scales 1.1x larger when we hover over it.

I was talking to Andy Bell, and he gave me some suggestions on implementation.

@media screen and (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
  * {
    animation-play-state: paused !important;
    transition: none !important;
    scroll-behavior: auto !important;
  }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

After implementing the changes, we have the hover effects, but none of the transitions.

This strategy technically works well. However, I want to remove the hover effect altogether and keep the link as an underline. I may also play with the scale.

@media screen and (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
  * {
    animation-play-state: paused !important;
    transition: none !important;
    scroll-behavior: auto !important;
  }

  a {
    padding-bottom: 0;
    border-bottom: none;
    text-decoration: underline;
  }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

With that change, now all my links are just a simple underline.

Screenshot of underlined text.

Without the transition animation, the call to action links are a bit jarring going from scale(1) to scale(1.1) on hover. So I changed it to scale(1.05).

@media screen and (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
  * {
    animation-play-state: paused !important;
    transition: none !important;
    scroll-behavior: auto !important;
  }

  a {
    padding-bottom: 0;
    border-bottom: none;
    text-decoration: underline;
  }

  .blog__more-link a {
    text-decoration: none;
  }

  .blog__more-link a:hover {
    transform: scale(1.05);
  }

  .hero__cta a {
    text-decoration: none;
  }

  .hero__cta a:hover {
    transform: scale(1.05);
  }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

How to test on a mac

This setting is primarily available on macOS.

  1. Go to System Preferences
  2. Go to Accessibility
  3. Go to Display
  4. Check "Reduce Motion"

Easy Peasy! As soon as this post is published, you should be able to test this on my blog!

Creating a user controlled option to reduce motion

Andy Bell's dark mode post inspired me to add the user-controlled option. We want to have the user's preferences take priority. We also want to account for people who don't have these settings available to them.

Here's how we are going to do this:

  1. Create a checkbox with the label "reduce motion."
  2. Add a checked state and a method to toggle that state in my Gatsby App.
  3. Use that state to control a data-user-reduced-motion attribute.
  4. Apply the CSS using the above attribute.
  5. Store that in localStorage, so we preserve the user settings.

Creating a <ReduceToggle /> Component

This component is an HTML checkbox with a label. As a disclaimer, I am using a class component and not hooks. I still like writing classes sometimes, and it was easier for my thought process. Keep an eye out for a hook version!

import React from 'react'

class ReduceToggle extends React.Component {
  render() {
    return (
      <div className="toggle">
        <input id="reduce-motion" type="checkbox" />
        <label htmlFor="reduce-motion">Reduce Motion</label>
      </div>
    )
  }
}

export default ReduceToggle
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The only thing I've done here is to create a checkbox input with an associated form label. Something you may have noticed is that instead of for, React uses htmlFor.

After that, I place it in my <Header /> component above the menu. I'll worry about styling finesse later; I know it'll break my layout, and that's ok. We are only worried about functionality right now.

Adding in the states

We want to go ahead and add a checked state to our constructor.

import React from 'react'

class ReduceToggle extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)

    this.state = {
      checked: false,
    }
  }

  render() {
    return (
      <div className="toggle">
        <input id="reduce-motion" type="checkbox" />
        <label htmlFor="reduce-motion">Reduce Motion</label>
      </div>
    )
  }
}

export default ReduceToggle
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now we are going to add that state to the checkbox itself.

import React from 'react'

class ReduceToggle extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)

    this.state = {
      checked: false,
    }
  }

  render() {
    const { checked } = this.state

    return (
      <div className="toggle">
        <input
          id="reduce-motion"
          type="checkbox"
          checked={checked}
        />
        <label htmlFor="reduce-motion">Reduce Motion</label>
      </div>
    )
  }
}

export default ReduceToggle
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Next, we want to add a toggleChecked method for the onChange event.

import React from 'react'

class ReduceToggle extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)

    this.state = {
      checked: false,
    }
  }

  toggleChecked = event => {
    this.setState({ checked: event.target.checked })
  }

  render() {
    const { checked } = this.state

    return (
      <div className="toggle">
        <input
          id="reduce-motion"
          type="checkbox"
          checked={checked}
          onChange={this.toggleChecked}
        />
        <label htmlFor="reduce-motion">Reduce Motion</label>
      </div>
    )
  }
}

export default ReduceToggle
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

I always like to double-check that the state is working using React Developer Tools. To do this:

  • I inspect the element
  • Go to the React Tab
  • Find the ReduceToggle component
  • Ensure the state is working correctly!

Now we know the state is working. Let's toggle the data-user-reduced-motion attribute value on the documentElement. I'm going to add that in the componentDidUpdate lifecycle method.

import React from 'react'

class ReduceToggle extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)

    this.state = {
      checked: false,
    }
  }

  componentDidUpdate() {
    const { checked } = this.state

    if (checked) {
      document.documentElement
        .setAttribute('data-user-reduced-motion', true)
    } else {
      document.documentElement
        .setAttribute('data-user-reduced-motion', false)
    }
  }

  toggleChecked = event => {
    this.setState({ checked: event.target.checked })
  }

  render() {
    const { checked } = this.state

    return (
      <div className="toggle">
        <input
          id="reduce-motion"
          type="checkbox"
          checked={checked}
          onChange={this.toggleChecked}
        />
        <label htmlFor="reduce-motion">Reduce Motion</label>
      </div>
    )
  }
}

export default ReduceToggle
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Adding CSS to the data-user-reduced-motion

Word of warning. It's tempting to jump into the CSS and copy and paste all the things. I recommend doing this one step at a time. I made the mistake of trying to do it all at once and spent a lot more time debugging than I wanted to. So first let's go back to the goals of what we want.

We want user preference to rule over system preferences. We'll add the system preferences as a progressive enhancement.

Gatsby is a Static Site Generator, so if JavaScript doesn't load, most of my static site should load. However, if JavaScript doesn't load, we want to fallback on system preferences when the data-user-reduced-motion attribute doesn't exist. So we are going to add a little bit to the query that we did in the first section about the media query itself. So we are using the :not() CSS pseudo-class to do that.

@media screen and (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
  * {
  :root:not([data-user-reduced-motion]) * {
    animation-play-state: paused !important;
    transition: none !important;
    scroll-behavior: auto !important;
  }

  a {
  :root:not([data-user-reduced-motion]) a {
    padding-bottom: 0;
    border-bottom: none;
    text-decoration: underline;
  }

  .blog__more-link a {
  :root:not([data-user-reduced-motion]) .blog__more-link a {
    text-decoration: none;
  }

  .blog__more-link a:hover {
  :root:not([data-user-reduced-motion]) .blog__more-link a:hover {
    transform: scale(1.05);
  }

  .hero__cta a {
  :root:not([data-user-reduced-motion]) .hero__cta a {
    text-decoration: none;
  }

  .hero__cta a:hover {
  :root:not([data-user-reduced-motion]) .hero__cta a:hover {
    transform: scale(1.05);
  }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Then we add the CSS outside the query for if the data-user-reduced-motion="true".

:root[data-user-reduced-motion='true'] * {
  animation-play-state: paused !important;
  transition: none !important;
  scroll-behavior: auto !important;
}

:root[data-user-reduced-motion='true'] a {
  padding-bottom: 0;
  border-bottom: none;
  text-decoration: underline;
}

:root[data-user-reduced-motion='true'] .blog__more-link {
  text-decoration: none;
  padding: 12px 14px;
  border: 2px solid;
}

:root[data-user-reduced-motion='true'] .blog__more-link:hover {
  transform: scale(1.05);
}

:root[data-user-reduced-motion='true'] .hero__cta__link {
  text-decoration: none;
  padding: 12px 14px;
  border: 2px solid;
}

:root[data-user-reduced-motion='true'] .hero__cta__link:hover {
  transform: scale(1.05);
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

To test, I did the following:

  1. Turned off any reduce motion settings on macOS
  2. With the Reduce Toggle unchecked, ensure that all animations are still there.
  3. Check the Reduce Toggle Checkbox and see that all the CSS changes to reduce motion are working.
  4. In the element inspector, go to the <html> document and find the data-user-reduced-motion. Remove that attribute. Here we are simulating that that attribute never loaded.
  5. Go to the system preferences and check Reduce Motion. We should have the CSS changes for reduced motion!

Adding localStorage

Now that we have that working, we want to start playing with localStorage. We want to preserve the user's preferences for the future. Choosing your settings every time you visit isn't the best user experience. If you don’t know what localStorage is, I would recommend pausing here and glancing over the docs. If you like video examples, take a look at Wes Bos’s JS30 tutorial.

The first thing we are going to do is set the localStorage on the componentDidMount.

import React from 'react'

class ReduceToggle extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)

    this.state = {
      checked: false,
    }
  }

  componentDidMount() {
    let reduceMotionOn = localStorage.getItem('reduceMotionOn')
    console.log(reduceMotionOn)
    // if we haven't been to the site before
    // this will return null
  }

  // All other code stuff

  render() {
    return (
      <div className="toggle">
        <input id="reduce-motion" type="checkbox" />
        <label htmlFor="reduce-motion">Reduce Motion</label>
      </div>
    )
  }
}

export default ReduceToggle
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now what we want to do is create a default localStorage state for the user if the reduceMotionOn is null. I'm going to set that to false.

import React from 'react'

class ReduceToggle extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)

    this.state = {
      checked: false,
    }
  }

  componentDidMount() {
    let reduceMotionOn = localStorage.getItem('reduceMotionOn')

    // Just a way to get around localStorage being
    // stored as a string and not a bool
    if (typeof reduceMotionOn === 'string') {
      reduceMotionOn = JSON.parse(reduceMotionOn)
    }

    if (reduceMotionOn === null) {
      localStorage.setItem('reduceMotionOn', false)
    }
  }

  // All other code stuff

  render() {
    return (
      <div className="toggle">
        <input id="reduce-motion" type="checkbox" />
        <label htmlFor="reduce-motion">Reduce Motion</label>
      </div>
    )
  }
}

export default ReduceToggle
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The last thing I am going to do upon mounting the component is set the state in the app. I want to ensure that my app's is the same as the localStorage.

import React from 'react'

class ReduceToggle extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)

    this.state = {
      checked: false,
    }
  }

  componentDidMount() {
    let reduceMotionOn = localStorage.getItem('reduceMotionOn')

    if (typeof reduceMotionOn === 'string') {
      reduceMotionOn = JSON.parse(reduceMotionOn)
    }

    if (reduceMotionOn === null) {
      localStorage.setItem('reduceMotionOn', false)
    }
    this.setState({ checked: reduceMotionOn })
  }

  // All other code stuff

  render() {
    return (
      <div className="toggle">
        <input id="reduce-motion" type="checkbox" />
        <label htmlFor="reduce-motion">Reduce Motion</label>
      </div>
    )
  }
}

export default ReduceToggle
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Go to Application > Local Storage in Chrome Dev Tools (Storage > Local Storage in Firefox). Then, clear the reduceMotionOn storage. Upon refresh, you should see that the reduceMotionOn is false. If you go to React Dev Tools and go to the <ReduceToggle /> component, you’ll find that the checked state matches the reduceMotionOn localStorage item.

That's not all! We have to toggle the localStorage in the toggleChecked method in the React component.

import React from 'react'

class ReduceToggle extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)

    this.state = {
      checked: false,
    }
  }

  // All other code stuff

  toggleChecked = event => {
    localStorage.setItem('reduceMotionOn', event.target.checked)
    this.setState({ checked: event.target.checked })
  }

  render() {
    return (
      <div className="toggle">
        <input id="reduce-motion" type="checkbox" />
        <label htmlFor="reduce-motion">Reduce Motion</label>
      </div>
    )
  }
}

export default ReduceToggle
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now if I check Reduce motion and leave the site, my user-controlled preferences are preserved!

Conclusion

Thanks for joining me while I added a progressively enhanced accessibility feature to my blog! I hope you learned something along the way. Shout out to Andy for inspiring me to write this post!

These are the key takeaways from this post, regardless of the framework that you use:

  1. Be careful with what you animate and provide options for those who have vestibular disorders.
  2. User-controlled > System Preferences
  3. Have system preferences for progressive enhancements
  4. Use localStorage to your benefit so that the user settings are preserved!

If you'd like to play around with this, I've made a CodeSandbox for you!

Stay in touch! If you liked this article:

  • Let me know on Twitter and share this article with your friends! Also, feel free to tweet me any follow up questions or thoughts.
  • Support me on patreon! If you like my work, consider making a $1 monthly pledge. You’ll be able to vote on future blog posts if you make a \$5 pledge or higher! I also do a monthly Ask Me Anything Session for all Patrons!
  • Be the first to learn about my posts for more accessibility funsies!

Cheers! Have a great week!

Top comments (10)

Collapse
 
chrisachard profile image
Chris Achard

Interesting - I definitely didn't know that prefers-reduced-motion was a thing before this. I also like how you set data-user-reduced-motion via JS in order to control CSS - I'm sure I'll use that trick in the future. Thanks!

Collapse
 
lkopacz profile image
Lindsey Kopacz

Thanks Chris! Andy (mentioned in the post) inspired me to do that!

Collapse
 
katiekodes profile image
Katie

So, I failed to do this by throwing an animated GIF in at the top of a post ... but "stop, Lindsey would ask you if this is really necessary" crossed my mind before I did.

I will get better! (And probably even edit the post after initial excitement wears off.)

Just wanted to let you know this post was noticed (even if best-practice not quite obeyed yet).

Collapse
 
katiekodes profile image
Katie

Correction: I just took the time and fixed it. Got a snapshot for the top; left the main animation down below with a "warning -- animation" note in the preceding paragraph.

Collapse
 
lkopacz profile image
Lindsey Kopacz

I think warnings make it better too!

Collapse
 
anpos231 profile image
anpos231

Question:
Why call component ReduceToggle and not ReduceMotionToggle?

Bonus:
Here is the same component made with hooks (I just love hooks)

import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'

const ReduceToggle = () => {
  const [ checked, setChecked ] = useState(false)

  // componentDidMount()
  useEffect(() => {
    const reduceMotionOn = localStorage.getItem('reduceMotionOn')

    if (typeof reduceMotionOn === 'string') {
      reduceMotionOn = JSON.parse(reduceMotionOn)
    }

    if (reduceMotionOn === null) {
      localStorage.setItem('reduceMotionOn', false)
    }

    setChecked(reduceMotionOn)
  }, [])

  // Handle toggle change
  const toggleChecked = event => {
    localStorage.setItem('reduceMotionOn', event.target.checked)
    setChecked(event.target.checked)
  }

  return (
    <div className="toggle">
      <input id="reduce-motion" type="checkbox" checked={checked} />
      <label htmlFor="reduce-motion">Reduce Motion</label>
    </div>
  )
}

export default ReduceToggle
Collapse
 
smh30 profile image
Stephanie Hope

What I find interesting about the prefers-reduced-motion option is that I didn't know that was an option which was available until I started studying coding. I have an intermittent vestibular condition, so it would have been useful information if it were more widely known!

Collapse
 
lkopacz profile image
Lindsey Kopacz

Yeah! I am brand new to it as well, wanted to make sure I shared my knowledge here!

Collapse
 
link2twenty profile image
Andrew Bone

Great article as always 🙂

Collapse
 
ellen_dev profile image
Ellen Macpherson

I had no idea this existed! Thanks so much for writing this up. I'm definitely going to be more mindful about my animations now.