This post series is indexed at NgateSystems.com. You'll find a super-useful keyword search facility there too.
Last reviewed: Nov '24
1. Introduction
Post 4.2 revealed that if you want your webapp to appear on web searches you must ensure that:
- Your webapp works well when viewed on the small screen of a mobile phone and
- All the content you want to be indexed by search engines is visible on the mobile version.
If your software is intended primarily for desktop users, this is a huge nuisance - but that's life. Let's see how you might tackle the problem systematically.
2. Responsive design using Tailwind
Responsive design uses the "baked-in" capability of CSS styling to test the width of the display device and adjust formatting accordingly. This all happens automatically within the browser - but you've still got to provide explicit instructions about what's to happen at each "breakpoint" (the screen width at which a new width-specific style is to be applied).
The standard CSS styling you've used through this series so far achieves these adaptive effects by using a technique called "media queries". But in this post, I'm going to introduce you to an "open library" called Tailwind. This is tailor-made for responsive styling and has many additional advantages.
Here's an example of Tailwind styling that constrains a centred heading to 95% of screen width on screens up to 768px wide. Above this width, the centered heading is constrained to 60% of the screen width:
<h1 class="w-[95%] md:w-[60%] mx-auto text-center">
Centered Heading
</h1>
Previously in this series, you've seen styles applied to HTML elements like <p>
by adding style="...."
and class="...."
qualifiers. Within a style="...."
qualifier you've seen reference to CSS properties such as width
and margin
that give the browser instructions on how you want the HTML element formatted. The class="...."
qualifier lets you reference a "tag" that you've created to define a particular collection of CSS properties that you want to use repeatedly. This arrangement keeps your code compact and also simplifies maintenance.
The essence of Tailwind is that it provides a system of single-purpose "utility classes", each of which applies a specific set of styles to an element. The class names are chosen judiciously to provide a meaningful and practical expression of styling intentions. The example below styles a <p>
element with 4rem padding on all four sides and a background color of light gray.
<div class="p-4 bg-gray-200">
This div has padding on all sides.
</div>
Here, in bg-blue-500
, bg
says that this is a background style, blue
sets the background colour to blue and 500
sets the colour "intensity" to a mid-value on a scale of 100 (light) to 900 (dark).
This is fine in its way, but the system may only become of interest to you when I tell you that you can make the tailwind utility classes responsive by simply adding a prefix to the style.
Tailwind recognizes the following screen-width "breakpoints":
Prefix | Screen Size | Minimum Width |
---|---|---|
sm |
Small devices | 640px |
md |
Medium devices | 768px |
lg |
Large devices | 1024px |
xl |
Extra large devices | 1280px |
2xl |
2x Extra large devices | 1536px |
A style class such as "bg-gray-200" might thus be made to apply only to screens larger than 640px by specifying it as "sm:bg-gray-200".
The "This div has padding on all sides." example above could thus be made to display its paragraph with a blue background on screens with a maximum width of 640px and green on screens larger than this by styling it as follows:
<p class="p-4 bg-blue-500 sm:bg-green-500">
This paragraph has a blue background on small screens and a green background on larger screens.
</p>
Because classes to the right take precedence, this makes the default background blue and overrides this with green when the screen is large enough.
For a fuller account of the Tailwind system and instructions on how to istall this in your project please see the Tailwind Website.
3. Adaptive design for Server-side rendered webapps
Responsive design won't help you achieve more drastic effects where the desktop and mobile versions of a webapp are seriously different. Whereas a responsive design adjusts a standard pattern"fluidly" to accommodate different screen sizes, an adaptive design is prepared to give screen widths tailor-made solutions.
Expanding on the "tailoring" theme, you might think of responsive design as creating a single suit made of stretchable fabric that fits anyone. By contrast, adaptive design is like creating multiple tailored suits for different body types.
So if, for example, you felt that the mobile customers for your webapp were completely different from your desktop fans, you might want to give each community a tailor-made design (while delivering both under the same URL).
Conceptually, the obvious way to express this arrangement would be a displayIsMobile
boolean guiding the display of MobileLayout
and DesktopLayout
components, as follows:
{#if displayIsMobile}
<MobileLayout />
{:else}
<DesktopLayout />
{/if}
But you will now ask "How is this displayIsMobile
boolean to be initialised?"
When a server receives a browser request for myURL/myPage
, the first thing that runs is usually a load()
function in a +page.server.js
file running server-side to provide the initial data for the page. When +page.svelte
for myPage
- also running server-side - receives this data it will want to perform an initial render of its "template" section and send a block of HTML back to the browser. But to do this, it needs a value for displayIsMobile
.
If you were running "client-side" then the answer would be simple - use the "window" object to inspect window.width
and set displayIsMobile
accordingly. But in this case, neither the +page.server.js
nor the +page.svelte
file, running server-side as they do, can directly interrogate the client.
One option might be to choose an appropriate default value for displayIsMobile
and return a default display. You could then use an onMount()
function on the client to inspect its window
properties and re-render the default display more appropriately. However, two consequences would follow:
- the re-rendering of the initial display would generate an unpleasant "flicker" effect on the client device as each page starts up and then re-renders.
- SEO would likely be seriously damaged because web-crawlers (which may not always execute JavaScript) might not see the correct content.
So, if you want to make a proper job of this you've got to find a way of setting displayisMobile
appropriately on the server. This way you will send a fully-rendered page to the client as quickly as possible, optimising both performance and SEO.
If you've read Post 3.5 you'll remember that the "headers" that accompany a server request can be used to transmit helpful information. Might the headers for a browser's request for page myURL/myPage
say anything useful?
Thankfully, the answer is "yes - they do". For example, the browser-requests user-agent
header includes an "Engine and Browser" component that might be used to tell you that the request is coming from a mobile rather than a desktop browser. But the user-agent
request header has its roots in computing's dimmest past and its functionality has struggled to balance multiple competing interests.
The chief issue here has been a concern that too precise a description of the user environment (the header also includes details of the user's browser, operating system type and version etc) may be used to identify and track users as they navigate the web. This issue remains unresolved.
Here's a "user-agent" example:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.9 Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
I think it's easy enough to see the problems you would encounter parsing this mess!
But there are other options. A recent initiative by Google proposed that browsers should provide a new, much simpler header called sec-ch-ua-mobile
. This contains a simple string that tells you whether or not the browser expects a mobile response (see Sec-CH-UA-Mobile for details).
However, while the sec-ch-ua-mobile
header is now available from Chrome and Edge, other browsers won't necessarily support the initiative. In any case, the sec-ch-ua-mobile
header doesn't give you enough detail to refine your response and serve, say, an explicit "tablet" version.
This is all very tedious, but it may be enough for you to conclude that you're happy to go with sec-ch-ua-mobile
as the first port of call and the user-agent
as a fallback. In that case, here's some code to give a +page.svelte
file an displayIsMobile
variable.
Confusingly it starts with a new type of Svelte file called a hooks.server.js
file.
While you might put the code to set displayIsMobile
for a +page.svelte
file in a load()
function, not every +page.svelte
page will have one of these. And even if it did (and you can always create one, of course), you'd find you had to duplicate the displayIsMobile
code in all load()
functions.
By contrast, the hooks.server.js
file is a sort of "super" load()
function that Svelte launches for every request submitted to the server. It runs before any other activity is executed. This makes it the perfect place to inspect the sec-ch-ua-mobile
header and create a value for displayIsMobile
.
The code below shows how displayIsMobile
might be constructed by a hooks.server.js
file. It also shows how this value might be communicated back to the expectant +page.svelte
file.
// src/hooks.server.js
export async function handle({ event, resolve }) {
let displayIsMobile;
console.log("event.request.headers['sec-ch-ua-mobile']: ", event.request.headers.get('sec-ch-ua-mobile'));
// First, try to get the mobile flag from the 'sec-ch-ua-mobile' header. This is a string header
// and its value is '?1' if the user agent is a mobile device, otherwise it is '?0'.
if (event.request.headers.get('sec-ch-ua-mobile') !== undefined) {
displayIsMobile = event.request.headers.get('sec-ch-ua-mobile') === '?1' ? true : false;
} else {
// Otherwise, try the 'user-agent' header. For robust mobile detection, you might consider using
// the ua-parser-js library. It provides consistent results across various edge cases.
if (event.request.headers.get('user-agent') !== undefined) {
displayIsMobile = event.request.headers.get('user-agent').toLowerCase().includes('mobile');
} else {
displayIsMobile = false
}
}
// Put displayIsMobile into event.locals. This is an object provided by SvelteKit that is specific to a
// particular browser request and which is acessible in every page and layout. In brief, event.locals lets
// you pass data throughout the lifecycle of a request in SvelteKit. It provides a convenient way to share
// computed values or state without needing to repeat logic or fetch data multiple times.
event.locals.displayIsMobile = displayIsMobile;
// Proceed with the request. In SvelteKit, resolve(event) is crucial for handling the request lifecycle.
// It processes the current request and generates the final response that will be sent back to the client.
const response = await resolve(event);
return response;
}
So now, displayIsMobile
is sitting in the event
object for the browser request. This event
is a complex object constructed by SvelteKit to represent the current request. It contains properties such as:
- event.request: This is the original Request object, containing details like the HTTP method (GET, POST, etc.), headers, URL, and body.
- event.locals: A place to make this data available throughout the request's subsequent lifecycle.
As you'll imagine, since event
will now be available everywhere it might be needed, event.locals
is exactly what you need to provide a home for displayIsMobile
.
The form of the {event, response}
argument to handle()
may perplex you. This is an example of "destructuring" syntax. This enables you to directly extract specific properties from an object without referencing the object itself. Imagine there's a super-object args
that contains event
and response
as properties. Then instead of using the conventional
function handle(args) {
const event = args.event;
const resolve = args.resolve;
// ... (code referencing variables "event" and "resolve")
}
"destructuring syntax" allows you to write this as
function handle({ event, resolve }) {
// ...(code referencing variables "event" and "resolve")
}
Essentially, this is a way of referencing properties (args.event
etc) of an object args
without knowing the parent object's name (args
). This leads to tighter, more resilient code.
Anyway, with all that said, with displayIsMobile
now sitting in the event
object for the browser request, the obvious thing to do is to use a load()
function in a +page.server.js
file to dig it out and return it to +page.svelte
.
// src/routes/+page.server.js
export function load({ locals }) {
//Provide a load function that returns the displayIsMobile flag to its associated +page.svelte file
return {
displayIsMobile: locals.displayIsMobile
};
}
So here, finally, is the very simple +page.svelte
file to deliver an adaptive page
// src/routes/+page.svelte
<script>
export let data;
</script>
<p>In +page.svelte : mobile is {data.
displayIsMobile}</p>
{#if data.displayIsMobile}
<p>You're on a mobile device.</p>
{:else}
<p>You're on a desktop device.</p>
{/if}
I hope you enjoyed that!
In summary, the full sequence is:
- The Sveltekit server fields the browser's
myURL/myPage
request and launches the project'shooks.server.js
file. Here, the request headers are retrieved, an appropriatedisplayIsMobile
value determined, and the result tucked away in the Sveltekitevent
object. - The
load()
function in the+page.server.j
file for themyPage
route retrievesdisplayIsMobile
fromevent
and returns it to+page.svelte
- The
+page.svelte
file retrieves thedata.displayIsMobile
value and uses this in its template section to generate appropriate HTML. - Sveltekit constructs scripts for the browser to add interactive behaviour. Tailwind references will already have been converted into CSS media queries during the page build.
- The browser receives this HTML, "hydrates" it with the Sveltekit scripts and renders it on the client device as directed by the media queries.
Once the page is hydrated, reactivity is purely a client-side concern. A SvelteKit {#if popupIsVisible
in the template section of your code will have become a compiled function that toggles DOM elements based on popupIsVisible
.
Top comments (0)