I have recently developed some static websites based on GatsbyJS which have a sticky footer. A sticky footer is always positioned on the bottom of the page, even for sparse content.
Unfortunately, I had some struggle to solve this and I, therefore, want to share my learnings with you.
Non-GatsbyJS solution
In a traditional HTML, CSS, JavaScript application we can use different ways to implement such a fixed footer but I prefer the Flexbox solution of Philip Walton.
Flexbox provides a nice solution for the sticky footer problem. It can be used to layout content in horizontal and vertical direction. So we just need to wrap the vertical sections (header, content, footer) in a flex container and choose which one should expand. In our case, we want the content to automatically take up all the available space in the container.
Following, you can see his solution:
<body class="site">
<header>…</header>
<main class="site-content">…</main>
<footer>…</footer>
</body>
The corresponding CSS classes:
.site {
display: flex;
min-height: 100vh;
flex-direction: column;
}
.site-content {
flex: 1;
}
Take a look at the live demo.
GatsbyJS solution
GatsbyJS is based on React and we, therefore, have to think different.
The basic layout.js
file from the official GatsbyJS default starter has a similar structure like the following example:
const Layout = ({ children }) => (
<StaticQuery
query={graphql`
query SiteTitleQuery {
site {
siteMetadata {
title
}
}
}
`}
render={data => (
<>
<Helmet
title={data.site.siteMetadata.title}
meta={[
{ name: 'description', content: 'Sample' },
{ name: 'keywords', content: 'sample, something' },
]}
>
<html lang="en" />
</Helmet>
<Header siteTitle={data.site.siteMetadata.title} />
<div>{children}</div>
<Footer />
</>
)}
/>
);
export default Layout;
So if we would style <body></body>
and the <div>{children}</div>
as proposed in Philip Walton’s solution it would not work.
But why? Because it would mean that the <Footer/>
component would be included in the <body></body>
.
To solve the problem I added a new <div></div>
tag which is the equivalent to the <body></body>
tag of the above mentioned example.
So my layout.js
looks this way:
const Layout = ({ children }) => (
<StaticQuery
query={graphql`
query SiteTitleQuery {
site {
siteMetadata {
title
}
}
}
`}
render={data => (
<>
<Helmet
title={data.site.siteMetadata.title}
meta={[
{ name: 'description', content: 'Sample' },
{ name: 'keywords', content: 'sample, something' },
]}
>
<html lang="en" />
</Helmet>
<div className="site">
<Header siteTitle={data.site.siteMetadata.title} />
<div className="site-content">{children}</div>
<Footer />
</div>
</>
)}
/>
);
export default Layout;
The CSS:
.site {
display: flex;
min-height: 100vh;
flex-direction: column;
}
.site-content {
flex-grow: 1;
}
You can see a working example on my GitHub Traffic Viewer website. The first page shows a spare content but the footer is stuck to the bottom. If you sign in and see the result list, the footer is also shown on the bottom of the page.
I hope this post is also helpful for you if you try to implement a sticky footer in a GatsbyJS website.
Happy Coding!
Top comments (11)
Even better position: sticky
Have you read this? philipwalton.github.io/solved-by-f...
The idea is not fixing the footer, or making it sticky, but to make sure the footer is on the bottom of the viewport even though the entire page is smaller, and of course just have it run it's natural course when the page is larger than the viewport
thanks, this is helpful
Genius!
This is so simple and works a treat.
Thank you SO much! I've been trying everything to get the sticky footer to work on gatsby!
Thank you so much for taking the time to share this with us. You saved me a lot of time. Thanks again!
Thanks for sharing, Michael! While I'm using Next.js and not Gatsby, I had basically the same problem and this led me to the solution. Thanks again.
Great! You just saved me quiete some time, thank you!
Yeah with flexbox and CSS grid you can't use position: fixed;
You use position: sticky;