DEV Community

What do you dislike about your favorite language?

Meghan (she/her) on June 02, 2018

To truly appreciate our languages, we must know their faults. So what's your pet peeves and biggest pains in you side about your favorite language you use everyday?

Collapse
 
_bigblind profile image
Frederik πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»βž‘οΈπŸŒ Creemers

In Python, if you write multiple strings adjacent to each other, Python concatenates them. For me, this often leads to annoying bugs like

l = [
    "A",
    "B"
    "C",
    "D"
]

print l
# prints ["A", "BC", "D"]
Collapse
 
val_baca profile image
Valentin Baca

You can thank ISO C for that one:

Not that python directly inherits the behavior, but they probably decided to go with that behavior based on how C does it.

Collapse
 
nektro profile image
Meghan (she/her)

Ouch! Haha yeah I can see how that hide it self well!

Collapse
 
perttisoomann profile image
Pert Soomann

When you see that one article saying that "this language X is so dead!" and it makes you doubt your life choices.

Collapse
 
cjbrooks12 profile image
Casey Brooks • Edited

In Java and Kotlin, I usually create literal arrays with each item on a new line and all columns lined up nicely. To add a new item, I can then just copy any line and change what I need. To edit all items at once I just add a carat at the beginning of each line and off I go.

EXCEPT FOR THE LAST LINE WHICH DOESN'T HAVE A COMMA.

val items = arrayOf(
    Item(1, "One",   1.1),
    Item(2, "Two",   2.2),
    Item(3, "Three", 3.3),
    Item(4, "Four",  4.4),
    Item(5, "Five",  5.5) // <-- I want to put a comma here so badly!
)
Collapse
 
thermatix profile image
Martin Becker • Edited

For me I would say in ruby how easy it is for nil to passed around which then causes can't do #x for nil and then you're like, "why is it nil?" it's even worse when you get nil in weird strange places.

Collapse
 
doshirae profile image
Doshirae

In Ruby, the fact that the normally-named filter function is named select or find_all is really annoying

And oh gosh way too many methods for the objects that is insane. You can easilly cut it down to 2 times less because there is a lot of aliases too

Collapse
 
antjanus profile image
Antonin J. (they/them)

Golang is one of my favorite languages and the thing I find the most frustrating is the lack of architecture standards.

Up until recently, it's been a wild west as far as package management and project setup. Where do you put your code? How do you structure your folders? What web frameworks are actually worth investing into?

Basically same issues Node had early on. It's getting MUCH better but I feel like it's still a problem.

Collapse
 
bwhitelaw24 profile image
Ben W

I feel like you just dont need a framework in Go, also hasn't the location of where the code should go been in the documentation since release?

Collapse
 
ecnepsnai profile image
Ian Spence

Golangs lack of enum support is easily the most annoying thing about the language for me.

Currently I have a ruby script that has an enum schema and it prints out golang code for each enum it has all of the constants, an array of all the values, and a function to test if a given object is one of the enum values.

Collapse
 
jdsteinhauser profile image
Jason Steinhauser

Strong typing can help minimize or eliminate whole hosts of errors at compile time, as opposed to type-based errors rearing their ugly heads only during testing and production. Things like clojure.spec and TypeScript are a good segue between strong/weak typing. As someone who is functionally inclined, I would imagine you've read some of the reasons that Idris and Haskell were created.

Collapse
 
maxart2501 profile image
Massimo Artizzu

FYI: there are indeed types existing in JavaScript.

I know that very well. I was hoping that was clear enough... It wasn't the case, apparently πŸ˜•

strong types are extremely overrated.

"Extremely", really?
Look, I really like JavaScript and I generally don't mind the lack of typed variables, but a tool for static analysis is indeed quite handy.
Not to mention that with strong types the code can be more easily optimized by the engine, saving a lot of euristic work by the compilers.

A gentle introduction to typed variables as it's done in TypeScript would be great in that sense.

Collapse
 
jdsteinhauser profile image
Jason Steinhauser

F# is usually my go-to language, but I was once asked to write something in OCaml. F# is an OCaml derivative, so how hard could it be? It turns out several of the idiosyncrasies made it take longer for me to develop a simple tool. So basically, I dislike the small, yet significant, differences between F#, OCaml, and ReasonML.

Collapse
 
k2t0f12d profile image
Bryan Baldwin

Diphthongs!

Collapse
 
maple3142 profile image
maple

javascript "weak typing", not dynamic typing.

Collapse
 
maxart2501 profile image
Massimo Artizzu

That's easy: there are no types in JavaScript (and it will be like that for a long while).

Collapse
 
clamstew profile image
Clay Stewart

It’s not really the language itself, but the JavaScript Front end framework ecosystem changed A LOT in the past decade, and it was jarring to switch frameworks every two years.

Collapse
 
justintervala profile image
JustinTervala

If Python is going to use whitespace as syntax (good idea) they should only allow either tabs or spaces. You can't mix them, so you get invisible syntax errors.

Collapse
 
lmn profile image
Laxman

The only thing that can be bad is your favorite programming language becoming so (too) popular that it eventually looks like shit!

Collapse
 
msoedov profile image
Alex Miasoiedov

Performance penalty of abstraction in Python/Ruby

Collapse
 
alejandronanez profile image
Alejandro ÑÑñez Ortiz

number.toFixed(x) will return a STRING in Javascript. Omg that’s nuts!

Collapse
 
maxart2501 profile image
Massimo Artizzu

?!
Granted that its goal is to provide a representation with a fixed amount of decimals, what would you use instead of a string?

Collapse
 
tadaboody profile image
Tomer

Pythons import system. Once I have dirs I just can't do it