Introduction:
In CSS, the :not() pseudo-class serves as a powerful tool for selecting elements that do not match a given set of selectors. By negating specific selectors, :not() offers flexibility in styling and targeting elements in a document. However, its usage comes with nuances and unexpected outcomes that developers need to understand to leverage it effectively.
Syntax:
The syntax of the :not() pseudo-class is straightforward:
:not(<complex-selector-list>) {
/* CSS rules */
}
Here, <complex-selector-list>
represents a comma-separated list of one or more selectors that the element should not match.
Key Points:
- Useless Selectors: :not() can lead to writing selectors that are ineffective. For instance, :not(*) matches any element that is not an element itself, rendering the accompanying rule useless.
- Specificity Increase: It's essential to note that :not() can increase the specificity of a rule. This means that selectors like #foo:not(#bar) will have higher specificity due to the presence of multiple ID selectors.
- Replacement of Specificity: The specificity of :not() is determined by the most specific selector within its argument list, similar to :is(). It essentially adopts the specificity of the selectors it negates.
- Surprising Matching: :not() selects everything that is "not an X." This can lead to unexpected results, especially when used with descendant combinators, as there may be multiple paths to select a target element.
- Negating Multiple Selectors: Multiple selectors can be negated simultaneously using :not(). For example, :not(.foo, .bar) is equivalent to :not(.foo):not(.bar).
- Handling Invalid Selectors: If any selector within :not() is invalid or unsupported, the entire rule will be invalidated. To overcome this, the :is() pseudo-class can be used, as it accepts a forgiving selector list.
Advance instance
Conclusion:
The :not() pseudo-class is a valuable asset in the CSS arsenal, offering a means to target elements that do not match specific selectors. However, its usage requires careful consideration of its behavior and potential quirks to avoid unintended consequences. By understanding its syntax, intricacies, and best practices, developers can wield the :not() pseudo-class effectively to enhance the styling and structure of their web projects.
Top comments (2)
Great article! I'm always using :not() but you pointed out quite a few things I didn't know before, especially the specificity part.
You are very welcome! Will be more, CSS ninja stuff 🥷