When CentOS shifted to CentOS Stream, many users began searching for stable alternatives that could match CentOS's reputation for being reliable and enterprise-friendly. Two of the top contenders emerged as AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux. Both distributions offer RHEL-compatible Linux systems, but they have distinct features, communities, and support systems that may sway users one way or another. If you're comparing Rocky Linux vs AlmaLinux or deciding between AlmaLinux or Rocky Linux, this guide provides a clear overview of both options to help you make the right choice.
Background of AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux
Both AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux were developed in response to Red Hat’s decision to transition CentOS from a stable RHEL downstream to CentOS Stream, which follows RHEL upstream. This left users in need of a stable, free, RHEL-compatible solution, which both of these distributions aim to deliver.
AlmaLinux was created by CloudLinux, a company with a long-standing reputation for providing stable commercial Linux solutions. The backing of CloudLinux provides AlmaLinux with a strong financial foundation and a team of experienced developers. AlmaLinux was quickly adopted by many in the Linux community due to its commercial support and stable releases.
On the other hand, Rocky Linux was founded by Gregory Kurtzer, the original creator of CentOS. This project is community-driven, mirroring the original intent and structure of CentOS, which makes it attractive to users who preferred CentOS’s approach. The community-led model of Rocky Linux aims to ensure that it remains independent and true to the open-source ethos, making it a direct continuation of the CentOS mission.
Community Support and Development Model
When considering AlmaLinux vs Rocky Linux, community support is a major factor that distinguishes the two.
Rocky Linux operates with a purely community-driven development model. This means that its releases, updates, and roadmap are shaped by the contributions and input of its users. The Rocky Linux community is deeply involved in the evolution of the project, offering a decentralized and open development process. The community ensures that Rocky Linux is tailored to the needs of its users and adheres closely to the principles of open-source software.
In contrast, AlmaLinux benefits from a strong combination of community involvement and commercial backing. While the AlmaLinux community actively participates in its development and provides feedback, the project also benefits from CloudLinux’s financial and technical support. This can provide added peace of mind to enterprise users who want the assurance that their chosen distribution is backed by a financially stable entity.
Release Cycles and Stability
Both AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux aim to be 100% binary compatible with RHEL, and as such, their release cycles closely follow Red Hat's. Both distributions provide users with stable and reliable updates, ensuring long-term support and compatibility with RHEL.
AlmaLinux, however, benefits from the structured backing of CloudLinux, which brings additional resources and expertise to the table. This means that AlmaLinux can often push out timely security patches and updates quickly, ensuring that its users are always protected against vulnerabilities.
Rocky Linux mirrors the CentOS model of community-driven releases. While Rocky Linux also aims to provide timely updates, the community-driven nature may result in a slightly different release management process compared to the more commercial approach of AlmaLinux.
Performance, Usability, and Support
Both distributions are designed to mirror RHEL in terms of performance and usability. Users can expect similar functionality, speed, and system performance, regardless of whether they choose AlmaLinux or Rocky Linux. Both distros offer smooth migration paths from CentOS, making it easy for users to switch without major disruptions.
In terms of usability, Rocky Linux shines for those who prefer a purely open-source community approach. It provides freedom from commercial influence and is favored by organizations and individuals who want to stick to the traditional CentOS principles.
AlmaLinux, on the other hand, offers a more polished and supported experience, thanks to CloudLinux’s backing. It might appeal to users who need commercial support or who prefer the assurance that a team of experienced developers is actively working on the project, ensuring a high degree of reliability and stability for enterprise environments.
Migration and Long-Term Viability
Migrating from CentOS to either AlmaLinux or Rocky Linux is designed to be seamless. Both distributions offer tools and documentation to help users make the transition as smoothly as possible, with minimal disruptions to workflows.
In terms of long-term viability, both AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux have committed to offering stable, long-term support for their users. However, the community-driven nature of Rocky Linux means that its future largely depends on the continued support and contributions from its user base.
AlmaLinux, backed by CloudLinux, offers the added assurance of commercial longevity, which may appeal to enterprise users seeking a more predictable long-term roadmap.
Conclusion:
The decision between AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux ultimately comes down to your specific needs and preferences. If you're looking for a community-driven project that carries forward the legacy of CentOS, Rocky Linux is a fantastic choice. It provides a stable, RHEL-compatible distribution with the freedom and transparency of a purely open-source model.
Top comments (0)