Introduction
Monorepos are fantastic. They let you maintain all your projects in a single repository. I use one at my workplace and I see its advantages everyday. If you know anything about monorepos, setting them up can be tricky sometimes. Recently, I've been following the developments over at Turborepo, which attempts to make setting up the tooling for monorepose simpler. The more I look through their docs, the more I get exited about using it. So, I gave it a shot and I have to say, the experience has been fantastic.
Why this article?
If you're wondering you can just go to their docs and set it up yourself, yes, you absolutely can. They have a cli which can help you setup a new project and they have a solid set of examples for most scenarios. But, it is super fun setting things up from scratch, and I wanted to see how much of work it is with Turborepo.
The setup
I'll setting up a new monorepo with a couple of simple apps and a UI library which would be shared by the apps. The goal is not the design and functionalities of these apps, but the tooling and features Turborepo provides. There will be two apps admin
and products
, both of them will be bundled using Vite. Vite is blazing fast and you should definitely give it a try just for its speed. The UI library, which will contain just a button component, which is written in TypeScript, will be bundled using tsup. tsup
uses esbuild
underneath, so we can expect blazing fast build times. I'll be using yarn for package management. We will also be using a common eslint
configuration which will be shared across all three codebases.
Let's get started!
Turborepo stuff
Let's first create a folder for our project and start initialising our monorepo.
As with any JS project, we start with a package.json
.
package.json
This is the initial config I'm using. It has turbo
and eslint
installed as a devDependency. If you are familiar with monorepos, the workspaces
array should make sense. All the projects in your monorepo should be listed as a workspace. Here, we have two directories, apps
contain admin
and products
, and packages
, which contains the UI library and the eslint configuration. Anything that can be shared across multiple projects can live in the packages
folder.
Next is our turbo.json
. This is Turborepo's config file. I browsed through their examples and found the simplest config to get started.
turbo.json
We'll be covering this in a later section.
Setting up apps
Vite has a cli which makes it easier for us to bootstrap a React app.
In our apps
folder, run
yarn create vite admin --template react
This will create a new react app named admin
. Similarly, we can create products
app as well.
yarn create vite products --template react
Now we have two apps named admin
and products
in our apps
directory.
Setting up the library
I've added all the dependencies needed for a TS library with types and eslint packages. Also added are the scripts for build
, dev
, lint
.
packages/ui/package.json
Now, lets simply add a Button
component and export it.
packages/ui/Button.tsx
packages/ui/index.tsx
Now, our project looks like this
Now that we have setup our apps and library, we can setup the tooling to link(turbocharge) them.
Add library as a dependency
The next step is to add the library as a dependency to our apps. It is as simple as adding it to devDependecies
in both apps/admin/package.json
and apps/products/package.json
.
Turborepo will use the name
field in the library's package.json
to resolve it in the apps.
We can now use this Button
component in admin
and products.
In apps/admin/src/App.jsx
We can do the same thing in apps/products/src/App.jsx
as well.
Adding scripts
The final step before we test this is to add scripts for build
, lint
and dev
. In our root package.json
, we can add
These commands are directly tied to the pipeline
configurations in turbo.json
. For example, if we look at the build
command, with the "dependsOn": ["^build"],
option, we are letting Turborepo know that build commands should only be run after all its dependencies are built. Turborepo is smart enough to realise admin
has a dependency ui
, which needs to be built before building admin
. So, it builds ui
first and then bundle admin
. Pipelines
are a powerful feature in Turborepo and you can read about it here.
Now, there is nothing left but to run our two apps. First, we would need to install our dependencies by running,
yarn install
Then, we start the dev server using
yarn dev
If we inspect the terminal messages, we can see that admin
is running in localhost:3000
and products
is running in localhost:3001
.
(Look at the insane 2.914s start times! Vite FTW!)
Now if we navigate to localhost:3000
, we see
We can see our button component is rendering as expected.
Setting up shared lint config
Similar to how we shared a library across apps, we can share config files across apps as well. We'll be using a single eslint
config in all our apps and library. For that we shall create a folder called config
in our packages
directory.
Inside it, we'll create a file eslint-preset.js
,
And a package.json
.
packages/config/package.json
The package.json contains all the eslint
packages we'll be needing, and notice the files
property includes the lint config file.
Now, we add config
as a dev dependency in admin
, products
and ui
. In each of their package.json
, add it as a devDependency
apps/admin/package.json
Also, we would need a .eslintrc.js
which simply exports the lint config from config
.
apps/admin/.eslintrc.js
Now, we we run yarn lint
on our root folder, Turborepo will run the lint command on all of our projects.
Notice that we did not need to install eslint
(except in the root) or its corresponding packages anywhere else other than the config
folder.
Awesome! We have setup our own monorepo with two apps, a library and a shared eslint config.
Conclusion
This idea of monorepos can be extended and even backend code can be added to the same repo. One awesome use-case I can think of is sharing types between frontend and backend apps using a shared package. We have barely scratched the surface of Turborepo and its features. Remote Caching
is one such feature I'm exited to try out. Meanwhile, this exercise was a great starting point.
The source code for this can be found here
Cheers!
Top comments (14)
hey thanks for sharing this article with us! can you please let me know, how to manage the state ( like redux ) across multiple workspaces?
You can share utilities like those for managing procedures and functions, but sharing state isn't possible. In development, states exist in the same place, but in production, each app is independent and manages its own states, whether using Redux or another state management solution.
Hey @thesohailjafri, thank you for your response. :)
I commented during my initial time as a developer, so I'm asked this question without fully understanding the TurboRepo concept.😅
Great. So how is turbo usage in your project, and what key advice can you share? Im setting up few new projects definitely can those advice
We used Turbo in our company projects, but we faced many issues while working with a team using Turbo Repo. So, we decided to stop using it. :(
can you elaborate so that I can access whether we should continue or migrate to individual repos
Hey @thesohailjafri , thanks for asking! 😊 I’d be happy to share our experience with TurboRepo. It has some great features for managing multiple packages within a mono-repo, but we encountered challenges with how it handles shared states and dependencies across a team. For example, we ran into conflicts when team members updated packages or dependencies, causing issues with consistency and compatibility. Managing caching and state across different CI/CD environments also became complex, leading to much debugging and slowing down our development workflow.
One specific example was when we used React Email in TurboRepo to connect multiple email templates across three of our apps. Initially, everything worked well, but right before a critical go-live period, we encountered a build error with React Email. We hadn’t changed any versions or settings on our end, but the error blocked deployment for the other apps relying on it. Since we needed to push the latest changes live by Monday, this was a real blocker.
I raised the issue with the React Email community on Discord, and although they eventually fixed it, it took a few days—time we didn’t have. To keep things moving, we used a patch-package workaround to fix it temporarily and managed to push our updates live. Later, we decided to remove React Email from TurboRepo altogether and instead set it up in a separate serverless mode. Now, we pass the email ID and necessary parameters to an email API, which triggers the email independently.
Ultimately, we found that individual repos gave us more control and reduced the risk of conflicts in collaborative work. I’d recommend weighing the complexity of your project and how many shared dependencies you have—if it’s manageable, individual repos might give you a bit more flexibility! Let me know if you need more details on any specific issues we faced. 😊
Ohh this really helpful insight, currently we are team of 3 so conflict could be easily managed and we share shared resources across 2 frontend and 1 backend. So i think we can pull turbopack but in any case we had problems I mention it here for future reader
Hey @thesohailjafri , I’m glad you found the insights helpful! 😊 With a smaller team, TurboRepo could be a great fit for your setup. If you ever run into any issues or just want to chat about it, feel free to reach out. Good luck with everything, and happy to help! 👍
It was a great help Jackson thanks for sharing your insight!!!
Could you please add an example using React-TypeScript template? 🙏
Do you still need it?? Im planning on doing one. Love to see the support
Oh no, it's fine :)
Thanks 😊
@siddharthvenkatesh It would have been great if you had added few snippets of code in text like config to copy paste. Else good read