JSON Schema is a JSON format that describes JSON formats.
It is mostly used to validate that a JSON value has the correct format, but it can also be used to generate random values that fit a schema definition. This may be useful for testing.
The latest version of JSON Schema is called "Draft 2020-12", and the way to define a schema using this draft:
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
...
}
Previous versions were called Draft-03 (2010), Draft-04 (2013), ... up to Draft-08 which was renamed into Draft 2019-09. When exploring Haskell libraries that handle JSON Schema definitions, they tend to have stalled on an earlier draft. There seems to be a pattern, and Juspay's medea package has already summarised what's going on in their README section Why Medea?; where their answer goes in depth with some sober roasting, I'll summarise:
- The JSON Schema standard is complex
- It [...] covers considerably more than simply validating JSON documents
- JSON Schema requires arbitrary URI resolution
This reminds me of Bloodhound's support for ElasticSearch version 1 and 5 (and why the library doesn't support version 6, 7, or 8): The complexity and constant release of new ElasticSearch API versions makes it difficult to make a typed library around it. I'm not sure exactly how to phrase it, but Haskell seems like a bad fit for this type of highly volatile interface. Adding recursive, unbounded network I/O as part of the validation makes a Haskeller less likely to pursue a full implementation.
Never the less. I did a deep scan for the word "schema" on https://hackage.haskell.org/packages/ and procured the following list of JSON Schema-specific packages. They fall into one of two categories.
When a spec is too complex, a few things can happen
First, there's the "we tried and gave up" category; they all have in common that they're attempts to make a working library for an early version of JSON Schema, and they all have in common that they're abandoned; such is the fate of open source sometimes.
- aeson-schema: Only Draft-03, recommends hjsonschema instead.
- hjsonschema: Only Draft-04, announced deprecated in an attempt to be too modular.
- jsonschema-gen, jsons-to-schema: Only Draft-04, neither does validate, generates schemas based on values, some limitations apply.
Then there are the libraries that appear to be JSON Schema-related libraries judging by their name, but they are, in fact, all variations that explicitly do not attempt to support JSON Schema, but build something similar with more limited assumptions:
- json-schema: "It's haskell specific and has no relation to json-schema.org."
- aeson-schemas: Last updated in 2022! Type-safe schema language using Template Haskell. But it doesn't come with an option to load a JSON Schema .json file. So they're schemas in JSON, but not JSON Schema schemas.
- hschema-aeson: Last updated in 2022! A similar project that lets me specify schemas for Haskell data types and encode them as JSON. So they're schemas in JSON, but not JSON Schema schemas.
- schematic: Last updated in 2021. "It can be thought of as a subset of JSON Schema", "Schematic schemas can be exported to json-schema".
- medea: Last updated in 2021. "Medea is a schema language for JSON document structure. It is similar to JSON Schema, but is designed to be simpler and more self-contained."
- (quick-schema: Last updated 2015. Minimalistic JSON schema language. Not maintained, and not exactly up to par.)
Summary
If you wish to mostly support a 10-12 year old draft of JSON Schema using an unmaintained package that currently fails to build in a modern build environment, you have two options: aeson-schema, and hjsonschema. While one recommends the other, and the other is self-deprecated, I'm not completely sarcastic when I say that aeson-schema could work. It appears well made, and you may want to support a super old JSON Schema definition before it got complex, or even extend it to a later draft.
If you wish for any coverage of Draft 2020-12, you're in bad luck. Haskellers simply gave up and wrote alternative JSON schema libraries. If you're not trying to release a JSON specification into the public domain, and you're just picking a good internal pipe language that supports JSON, any of aeson-schemas, hschema-aeson, schematic, and medea may be good choices. Or you may look at entirely different serialisation frameworks.
While I cannot currently prioritise evaluating each of these, since I am in the process of releasing a specification for my new pet project, JSON Flashcard, and I do need for a specification format and not just a library, I'm trying my luck with schematic, because it allows me to export to JSON Schema, without trying to support it fully.
Top comments (0)