Tom

Posted on Apr 3 • Originally published at bubobot.com

Synthetic Monitoring Best Practices for Optimal Uptime

Incident is not not just annoying – it's expensive. Companies lose thousands every minute their systems are down. And beyond the immediate financial impact, you risk losing customer trust that took years to build.

Here's the problem that still plagues many teams: they wait for users to tell them something's wrong.

This reactive approach is like waiting for your car to break down on the highway before checking the oil. There's a better way, and it's called synthetic monitoring.

What Is Synthetic Monitoring?

Imagine having robots tirelessly clicking through your website 24/7, testing every button, form, and checkout flow – even when no real users are active. That's synthetic monitoring in a nutshell.

Traditional Monitoring: "Is the server up?"
Synthetic Monitoring: "Can users actually USE the system?"

The Three Pillars of Synthetic Monitoring

Synthetic monitoring breaks down into three key areas:

1. Availability Monitoring

This goes beyond simple ping checks. Modern availability monitoring verifies that:

Web servers respond correctly
APIs return valid data
SSL certificates are valid and not expiring soon
Special services (Kafka, MQTT, etc.) function properly

2. Web Performance Monitoring

Performance monitoring tracks metrics like:

Page load time
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
Time to Interactive (TTI)
API response times
Resource loading speeds

3. Transaction Monitoring

// Example login transaction test
const testLoginFlow = async () => {
  const browser = await puppeteer.launch();
  const page = await browser.newPage();

  try {
    // Step 1: Go to login page
    await page.goto('https://yourdomain.com/login');

    // Step 2: Fill credentials
    await page.type('#username', 'test-user');
    await page.type('#password', 'test-password');

    // Step 3: Submit form
    await Promise.all([
      page.click('#login-button'),
      page.waitForNavigation()
    ]);

    // Step 4: Verify successful login
    const loggedIn = await page.evaluate(() => {
      return document.querySelector('.user-avatar') !== null;
    });

    return {
      success: loggedIn,
      currentUrl: page.url()
    };
  } finally {
    await browser.close();
  }
};

const loginResult = await testLoginFlow();
console.log(`Login test: ${loginResult.success ? 'PASSED' : 'FAILED'}`);

Transaction monitoring tests complete user journeys, like:

User registration
Login/logout
Product search
Shopping cart checkout
Content submission

The Infrastructure Behind Synthetic Monitoring

Synthetic monitoring systems typically consist of five key components:

┌─────────────────┐     ┌─────────────────┐     ┌─────────────────┐
│                 │     │                 │     │                 │
│ Monitoring      │────▶│ Orchestration   │────▶│ Data Processing │
│ Agents          │     │ Layer           │     │ Pipeline        │
│                 │     │                 │     │                 │
└─────────────────┘     └─────────────────┘     └─────────────────┘
                                                        │
                                                        ▼
┌─────────────────┐     ┌─────────────────┐
│                 │     │                 │
│ Alerting        │◀────│ Storage &       │
│ System          │     │ Analytics       │
│                 │     │                 │
└─────────────────┘     └─────────────────┘

Monitoring Agents: Distributed test runners that execute checks from multiple locations
Orchestration Layer: Schedules and coordinates test execution
Data Processing Pipeline: Transforms raw test results into actionable metrics
Storage and Analytics: Preserves historical data and identifies trends
Alerting System: Notifies the right people when issues arise

Building an Effective Synthetic Monitoring Strategy

Identifying What to Monitor

Not everything needs the same level of monitoring. Start by asking these questions:

1. How much revenue does this service/feature generate?
2. How many customers would be affected if it fails?
3. Could a failure damage our brand reputation?
4. Is this a critical part of our business workflow?
5. Does this component have a history of problems?

Prioritize your monitoring based on the answers, focusing on business-critical paths first.

Strategic Test Distribution

Where you monitor from matters as much as what you monitor. A service that looks fine from your office might be completely inaccessible in another region.

Monitor Location Selection Factors:
- Where are your users located?
- Where are your servers/CDNs located?
- Do you have regulatory requirements in specific regions?
- Are there known network issues in certain areas?

Best practice: Test from at least 3 geographically distributed locations to triangulate issues.

Frequency Optimization

How often should you run your tests? It depends on the service criticality:

Critical Payment API: Every 30 seconds
Main Website: Every 1-2 minutes
Marketing Blog: Every 5 minutes
Weekly Report Generation: Every hour

Remember that more frequent testing gives you faster detection but consumes more resources.

Setting Meaningful Thresholds

Don't pull thresholds out of thin air. Base them on historical performance:

// Example threshold calculation (pseudocode)
function calculateThreshold(metricHistory, buffer = 1.5) {
  const p95 = calculatePercentile(metricHistory, 95);
  return Math.round(p95 * buffer);
}

// Usage
const responseTimeHistory = [120, 145, 133, 156, 128, 142, 138, 160, 131];
const threshold = calculateThreshold(responseTimeHistory);
console.log(`Recommended threshold: ${threshold}ms`);

This approach ensures you're alerting on actual abnormalities, not normal fluctuations.

Common Pitfalls and Practical Solutions

Monitoring Overload

Problem: Treating every component with the same level of urgency leads to alert fatigue and missed critical issues.

Solution: Create a tiered monitoring structure:

Tier 1 (Critical): Revenue-impacting services
- Payment processing
- Authentication
- Checkout flow
- Most frequent monitoring
- Wake people up at 3 AM

Tier 2 (Important): Core functionality
- Product search
- Account management
- Shopping cart
- Medium frequency
- Business hours alerts

Tier 3 (Supportive): Nice-to-have features
- Recommendation engine
- Comment system
- Less frequent checks
- Email notifications only

Resource Consumption

Problem: Overzealous testing can actually contribute to performance problems.

Solution:

Space out tests to avoid artificial traffic spikes
Use lightweight tests for high-frequency checks
Run resource-intensive tests during low-traffic periods
Consider the impact of test traffic in your capacity planning

Implementation Complexity

Problem: Starting too big leads to unmanageable monitoring systems.

Solution: Follow this implementation roadmap:

Start small: Monitor your most critical 3-5 user journeys
Validate value: Ensure your initial monitoring catches real issues
Expand gradually: Add more checks as you build confidence
Automate maintenance: Use infrastructure-as-code to keep monitoring in sync with your application

False Positives

Problem: Too many false alarms destroy trust in your monitoring system.

Solution: Implement verification steps:

Test from multiple locations before alerting
Require at least two failed checks before triggering alerts
Implement automatic retries for intermittent issues
Use graduated alerting (warning before critical)

Real-World Implementation Example

Here's how a mid-sized e-commerce company might set up their synthetic monitoring:

1. Critical Path Monitoring

A typical monitoring schedule might include:

High Frequency (30 seconds)
Homepage availability
Product API
Payment gateway
Medium Frequency (2 minutes)
Search functionality
Login process
Lower Frequency (5+ minutes)
Checkout flow
Account creation
Order history

2. Alert Routing Structure

(Example routing code)

// Alert routing based on service and time
function routeAlert(service, severity, timestamp) {
  const businessHours = isBusinessHours(timestamp);

  if (severity === 'critical') {
    // Critical alerts always page on-call, regardless of time
    pageOnCallEngineer(service);
    notifySlackChannel('incidents');
    return;
  }

  if (severity === 'warning' && businessHours) {
    // Warnings during business hours go to Slack
    notifySlackChannel('monitoring');
    return;
  }

  if (severity === 'warning' && !businessHours) {
    // Warnings after hours get queued for morning
    queueForMorningReview(service);
    return;
  }

  // Informational alerts just go to logs
  logAlert(service, severity);
}

3. Performance Baseline Monitoring

This company tracks their key pages against established baselines:

Homepage: < 1.5s load time
Product page: < 2s load time
Checkout page: < 2.5s load time

They alert when performance degrades by more than 20% from the baseline, and they review these thresholds quarterly based on actual performance data.

The Path Forward

Synthetic monitoring isn't just a technical necessity—it's a competitive advantage. By catching issues before your users do, you're protecting both revenue and reputation.

Here's a simple way to start:

Identify your 3 most critical user journeys
Implement basic availability monitoring for these paths
Expand to performance and transaction testing
Refine your approach based on the actual issues you catch

Modern tools make this easier than ever. Solutions like Bubobot offer industry-leading check frequencies (as fast as every 20 seconds), allowing you to catch issues almost immediately.

The most successful teams use synthetic monitoring not just for alerts, but as a continuous feedback loop that drives improvements across their systems. Every detected issue becomes an opportunity to enhance reliability.

For more detailed guidance on implementing an effective synthetic monitoring strategy, check out our comprehensive guide on the Bubobot blog.

SyntheticMonitoring #UptimeStrategies #DevOps

DEV Community