DEV Community

Cover image for AWS Karpenter Hands-on
AWS Community Builders profile image 🚀 Vu Dao 🚀
🚀 Vu Dao 🚀 for AWS Community Builders

Posted on

AWS Karpenter Hands-on

#aws #karpenter #cloudopz #eks

Abstract

  • Karpenter - Just-in-time Nodes for Any Kubernetes Cluster. It is one of Node-based autoscaling (adding or removing nodes as needed) beyond cluster autoscaler.
  • What does this post provides?
    • Hands on installing karpenter on EKS Cluster
    • Provide permission for Karpenter to create AWS resources through IAM for service account (IRSA)
    • Create sample karpenter provisioner to test scaling-out and scaling down nodes by karpenter
    • Finally what Karpenter improvements vs cluster autoscaler.

Table Of Contents

🚀 Pre-requisite

  • EKS cluster
  • IAM Instance profile which will be assigned to EKS nodes and help them to join the EKS cluster
  • OIDC provider

🚀 Create karpenter service account

  • The best practice to provide AWS permission for Kubernetes service is Using IAM Service Account Instead Of Instance Profile For EKS Pods
  • If you already setup OIDC by using IAM identity provider then you can create the IAM role as service account for karpenter manually or using CDK. The role needs permission on EC2 actions only kapenter-sa.ts
  • Then generate service-account yaml base on the output IAM role ARN
  • karpenter-sa.yaml

  • Create service account by kubectl apply -f karpenter-sa.yaml and then check the result

    ⚡ $ kf get sa -n karpenter
NAME                   SECRETS   AGE
karpenter-controller   1         17m

🚀 Install karpenter using helm chart 

  helm repo add karpenter https://charts.karpenter.sh
  helm repo update
  helm upgrade --install karpenter karpenter/karpenter --namespace karpenter \
    --version 0.8.1 \
    --values yaml/karpenter-values.yaml \
    --wait
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • Check the karpenter pod created, it is included controller and webhook containers. Describe the pod to ensure it is assigned correct serviceAccount with proper IAM role 
⚡ $ kf get pod -n karpenter
NAME                         READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE
karpenter-67f957c8c4-t752q   2/2     Running   0          2m56s
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • Note that Karpenter provide autoscalling nodes for our services but it still needs node to deploy itself, we run the Karpenter controller on EKS Fargate or on a worker node that belongs to a node group

🚀 Karpenter provisioner

  • Provisioner - Provides options for karpenter controller creates expected nodes such as instance profile, AMI family such as Bottlerocket, instance type, security group, subnet, tags, capicity type such as spot, etc.

  • Sample provisioner:

    • instanceProfile: As describe above, this profile just needs enough permissions to join the EKS cluster, eg. eks-node-role-dev with permission 'AmazonEKS_CNI_Policy', 'AmazonEKSWorkerNodePolicy', 'AmazonEC2ContainerRegistryReadOnly', 'AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore'
    • Use Bottlerocket as AMI family
    • subnetSelector: Specify tag of the subnet we want to host the nodes, we should use private subnet of the EKS VPC so ensure the private subnets have tag EksCluster/EKSVpc/PrivateSubnet*
    • securityGroupSelector: Specify tag of the security group we want to attach to the nodes
    • Node requirements: spot instances, small size as we just test
    • taints: Taint the nodes if we want to control our services assigned to expected nodes and seperate resources
    • dev-provisioner.yaml

  • Apply the yaml file by kf apply -f dev-provisioner.yaml and then check result

  ⚡ $ kf get provisioners.karpenter.sh
  NAME   AGE
  dev    1m
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

🚀 Test karpenter scaleout nodes

  • Test the karpenter provisioner we just create above by apply the deployment. First check that there's no provisioned node created yet 
  ⚡ $ kf get node -l karpenter.sh/provisioner-name=dev
  No resources found
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • Apply the deployment test-deployment.yaml, note that the deployment must have tolerations map with the taints if we specify in the provisioner. 
  ⚡ $ kf apply -f yaml/test-deployment.yaml
  deployment.apps/inflate created

  ⚡ $ kf get pod
  NAME                      READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE
  inflate-5db4558c8-rtd8g   1/1     Running   0          85s
  inflate-5db4558c8-x8sbn   1/1     Running   0          85s

  $ kf get node -l karpenter.sh/provisioner-name=dev
  NAME                                            STATUS   ROLES    AGE   VERSION
  ip-10-0-147-5.ap-northeast-2.compute.internal   Ready    <none>   77s   v1.22.6-eks-b18cdc9
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • We can check log of karpenter controller to see how it works 
  2022-04-10T10:20:56.558Z        INFO    controller.provisioning Batched 2 pods in 1.029435847s  {"commit": "78d3031", "provisioner": "dev"}
  2022-04-10T10:20:56.800Z        DEBUG   controller.provisioning Discovered subnets: [subnet-048931802b9fe4d68 (ap-northeast-2a) subnet-03112351e0b6460ab (ap-northeast-2c) subnet-089fe79a0c5c5247d (ap-northeast-2b)] {"commit": "78d3031", "provisioner": "dev"}
  2022-04-10T10:20:56.903Z        INFO    controller.provisioning Computed packing of 1 node(s) for 2 pod(s) with instance type option(s) [t3.xlarge]     {"commit": "78d3031", "provisioner": "dev"}
  2022-04-10T10:20:57.057Z        DEBUG   controller.provisioning Discovered security groups: [sg-074f63f39cbb17d7f sg-0de828621f69e459f] {"commit": "78d3031", "provisioner": "dev"}
  2022-04-10T10:20:57.059Z        DEBUG   controller.provisioning Discovered kubernetes version 1.22      {"commit": "78d3031", "provisioner": "dev"}
  2022-04-10T10:20:57.155Z        DEBUG   controller.provisioning Discovered ami-09fd6fd7a1729123a for query /aws/service/bottlerocket/aws-k8s-1.22/x86_64/latest/image_id        {"commit": "78d3031", "provisioner": "dev"}
  2022-04-10T10:20:57.327Z        DEBUG   controller.provisioning Created launch template, Karpenter-eks-dev-1642383919802956422   {"commit": "78d3031", "provisioner": "dev"}
  2022-04-10T10:20:58.997Z        DEBUG   controller.provisioning Discovered 257 EC2 instance types       {"commit": "78d3031", "provisioner": "dev"}
  2022-04-10T10:20:59.083Z        DEBUG   controller.provisioning Discovered EC2 instance types zonal offerings   {"commit": "78d3031", "provisioner": "dev"}
  2022-04-10T10:20:59.495Z        INFO    controller.provisioning Launched instance: i-0c33d36e900713716, hostname: ip-10-0-147-5.ap-northeast-2.compute.internal, type: t3.xlarge, zone: ap-northeast-2b, capacityType: spot    {"commit": "78d3031", "provisioner": "dev"}
  2022-04-10T10:20:59.518Z        INFO    controller.provisioning Bound 2 pod(s) to node ip-10-0-147-5.ap-northeast-2.compute.internal    {"commit": "78d3031", "provisioner": "dev"}
  2022-04-10T10:20:59.518Z        INFO    controller.provisioning Waiting for unschedulable pods  {"commit": "78d3031", "provisioner": "dev"}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • Go to AWS console to check the node

🚀 Karpenter Deprovisioning

  • How Karpenter nodes are deprovisioned

    • Node empty: Node with no pods (non-daemonset) will be deleted after ttlSecondsAfterEmpty
    • Node expired: based on ttlSecondsUntilExpired to delete node no matter of any workload. This option is to handle node upgrade with latest AMI. We can protect the application’s availability by using Disruption budgets
    • Disruption budgets - PodDisruptionBudget
    • By adding a karpenter.sh/do-not-evict annotation to the pod, you are instructing Karpenter to preserve the node until the Pod is terminated or the do-not-evict annotation is removed

  • In our provisioner, we specify ttlSecondsAfterEmpty: 30 so let's delete the test-deployment.yaml and check karpenter scale-down the node

  ⚡ $ kf delete -f yaml/test-deployment.yaml
  deployment.apps "inflate" deleted
  ⚡ $ kf get pod
  No resources found in default namespace.

  ⚡ $ kf get node -l karpenter.sh/provisioner-name=dev
  No resources found
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • See log for more detail 
  2022-04-10T10:33:31.785Z        INFO    controller.node Added TTL to empty node {"commit": "78d3031", "node": "ip-10-0-147-5.ap-northeast-2.compute.internal"}
  2022-04-10T10:34:01.000Z        INFO    controller.node Triggering termination after 30s for empty node {"commit": "78d3031", "node": "ip-10-0-147-5.ap-northeast-2.compute.internal"}
  2022-04-10T10:34:01.031Z        INFO    controller.termination  Cordoned node   {"commit": "78d3031", "node": "ip-10-0-147-5.ap-northeast-2.compute.internal"}
  2022-04-10T10:34:01.289Z        INFO    controller.termination  Deleted node    {"commit": "78d3031", "node": "ip-10-0-147-5.ap-northeast-2.compute.internal"}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

🚀 Troubleshooting

  • Error we might get and how to troubleshoot

    1. I got following error due to wrong setup the ServiceAccount 
      2022-03-15T14:59:22.984Z        ERROR   controller.provisioning Could not launch node, launching instances, getting launch template configs, getting launch templates, creating launch template, UnauthorizedOperation: You are not authorized to perform this operation. Encoded authorization failure message: u3BZrZUSziC6V7RjV0uPSiwFLaqJMFHwZIuPvJPp-p7sYQMP0EUtzbldDO7xSZD5XrdTLdFz_zxjzNhOPtnmenOgb-sEDxiMuClKprCuB4Gl2QxOJz97UYEFx5FB1Mks0qC-aoPrnMnDzKjdMlNdBsnj81UuFn9tnYBo3pIZG7A_Mwk7g6VotuOLDZl3sjZi15dyWQ6Roe1Htf_8uT2Wzw9n2WTF815us6SEA_3yh71xu4dEuPoT2CECj-RdbSgpcH6ZUi0UKDK3SRNvwLlibg8-dmvQriGC5eXRNRhQuMridNGIV4XmH1j8BN887nmgl023iZQ7XzV3Ge_5NY-MI0-Wsyk1gL57tm87n3CM23vGhTe1GIp2LvZMolVdE4IOgDn00DydMfI9VxD1KqJLNFuxwhzT0pv7JUYKR_i-H8ibmRgNAc-NXwDQBoEqk0OuSiTYBzYDsKyCgrtV4jwPHgOe9sC93GUegNJBrErc0sXSSxSR4pTqYu-Fw8CAPLKFzwph30rChTxlaONWfi-LyDpkpbV0i30soH-_vqJ244k49bs

    • The error of authorization status of a request was encoded so we need to decode for get more info of the error by using decode-authorization-message

       ~ $ aws sts decode-authorization-message --encoded-messag u3BZrZUSziC6V7RjV0uPSiwFLaqJMFHwZIuPvJPp-p7sYQMP0EUtzbldDO7xSZD5XrdTLdFz_zxjzNhOPtnmenOgb-sEDxiMuClKprCuB4Gl2QxOJz97UYEFx5FB1Mks0qC-aoPrnMnDzKjdMlNdBsnj81UuFn9tnYBo3pIG7A_Mwk7g6VotuOLDZl3sjZi15dyWQ6Roe1Htf_8uT2Wzw9n2WTF815us6SEA_3yh71xu4dEuPoT2CECj-RdbSgpcH6ZUi0UKDK3SRNvwLlibg8-dmvQriGC5eXRNRhQuMridNGIV4XmH1j8BN887nmgl023iZQ7XzV3Ge_5Y-MI0-Wsyk1gL57tm87n3CM23vGhTe1GIp2LvZMolVdE4IOgDn00DydMfI9VxD1KqJLNFuxwhzT0pv7JUYKR_i-H8ibmRgNAc-NXwDQBoEqk0OuSiTYBzYDsKyCgrtV4jwPHgOe9sC93GUegNJBrErc0sXSSxSR4pTqYu-FwCAPLKFzwph30rChTxlaONWfi-LyDpkpbV0i30soH-_vqJ244k49bs
 {
     "DecodedMessage": "{\"allowed\":false,\"explicitDeny\":false,\"matchedStatements\":{\"items\":[]},\"failures\":{\"items\":[]},\"context\":{\"principal\":{\"id\":\"AROAZUFR7JW2VHL4MT3MS:i-0fa071d72e68e7a33\",\"arn\":\"arn:aws:sts::123456789012:assumed-role/eks-node-role-dev/i-0fa071d72e68e7a33\"},\"action\":\"ec2:CreateLaunchTemplate\",\"resource\":\"arn:aws:ec2:ap-northeast-2:123456789012:launch-template/*\",\"conditions\":{\"items\":[{\"key\":\"aws:Region\",\"values\":{\"items\":[{\"value\":\"ap-northeast-2\"}]}},{\"key\":\"aws:ID\",\"values\":{\"items\":[{\"value\":\"*\"}]}},{\"key\":\"aws:Service\",\"values\":{\"items\":[{\"value\":\"ec2\"}]}},{\"key\":\"aws:Resource\",\"values\":{\"items\":[{\"value\":\"launch-template/*\"}]}},{\"key\":\"aws:Type\",\"values\":{\"items\":[{\"value\":\"launch-template\"}]}},{\"key\":\"aws:Account\",\"values\":{\"items\":[{\"value\":\"123456789012\"}]}},{\"key\":\"aws:ARN\",\"values\":{\"items\":[{\"value\":\"arn:aws:ec2:ap-northeast-2:123456789012:launch-template/*\"}]}}]}}}"
 }

  1. Invalid instance profile

    • Error

      2022-03-24T17:16:36.430Z        ERROR   controller.provisioning Could not launch node, launching instances, with fleet error(s), InvalidParameterValue: Value (eks-node-role-dev) for parameter iamInstanceProfile.name is invalid. Invalid IAM Instance Profile name {"commit": "78d3031", "provisioner": "dev"}

 - Reason in my case is that the IAM role attached to EC2 was created by CDK and the instance profile named eg. `eks-febfdbb4-6ab2-a865-acf8-2884edf78fdc` not the role name.
 - To fix this issue we can create new instance profile with role name and add to the role
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode 
    ```
    ⚡ $ aws iam create-instance-profile --instance-profile-name  eks-node-role-dev
    ⚡ $ aws iam add-role-to-instance-profile --instance-profile-name eks-node-role-dev --role-name eks-node-role-dev
    ```
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

🚀 Karpenter improvements

  • Karpenter improvements

    • Designed to handle the full flexibility of the cloud: Karpenter has the ability to efficiently address the full range of instance types available through AWS. Cluster autoscaler was not originally built with the flexibility to handle hundreds of instance types, zones, and purchase options.
    • Group-less node provisioning: Karpenter manages each instance directly, without using additional orchestration mechanisms like node groups. This enables it to retry in milliseconds instead of minutes when capacity is unavailable. It also allows Karpenter to leverage diverse instance types, availability zones, and purchase options without the creation of hundreds of node groups.
    • Scheduling enforcement: Cluster autoscaler doesn’t bind pods to the nodes it creates. Instead, it relies on the kube-scheduler to make the same scheduling decision after the node has come online. A node that Karpenter launches has its pods bound immediately. The kubelet doesn’t have to wait for the scheduler or for the node to become ready. It can start preparing the container runtime immediately, including pre-pulling the image. This can shave seconds off of node startup latency.

🚀 Conclusion

  • At the time of writing this post, Karpenter is still on its way to add/improve many features, check more here
  • In practice, we can create multiple karpenter provisioners in following usecases
    • When different teams are sharing a cluster and need to run their workloads on different worker nodes with specific request resources or AMI such as Bottlerocket
    • when create multiple vclusters and would like to seperate resources between vclusters.
    • In general, using multiple provisioners makes sure that the most appropriate assets are available to each team

References:

vumdao image

🚀 Vu Dao 🚀

🚀 AWSome Devops | AWS Community Builder | AWS SA || ☁️ CloudOpz ☁️

GitHub logo vumdao / vumdao

Top comments (0)

Read next

faboulaye profile image

Highly scalable image storage solution with AWS Serverless at ip.labs - Part 1

Firdaws Aboulaye -

she0407 profile image

AWS CODE PIPELINE

Shivani Patel -

grkashyap profile image

Developing cloud agnostic application

Rahul Kashyap -

jennapederson profile image

What I learned while building my first game

Jenna Pederson -