I originally posted this on my blog a couple of weeks ago. It's part of a series I've been publishing, called Unit Testing 101
Last time, we covered how to write our first unit tests with C# and MSTest. We started from a Console program and converted it into our first unit tests. We wrote those tests for Stringie, a (fictional) library to manipulate strings with more readable methods. This time, we will cover how NOT to write unit tests. These are four common mistakes we should avoid when writing our first unit tests.
1. Do not follow a naming convention
First, keep your tests in the right place. Have one test project per project, one test class per class. Add the suffix "Tests" in the name of your test projects and classes.
Choose a naming convention for your test names and stick to it.
In our previous post, we covered two naming conventions. An "ItShould" sentence and the three-part name separated with underscores. You can choose the one you like the most.
That time, for Stringie Remove()
method, we wrote test names like:
- "Remove_ASubstring_RemovesThatSubstring"
- "Remove_NoParameters_ReturnsEmpty"
Every test should tell the scenario under test and the expected result. We shouldn't worry about long test names. But, let's stop naming our tests: Test1
, Test2
and so on.
Don't prefix our test names with "Test". If we're using a testing framework that doesn't need keywords in our test names, let's stop doing that. With MSTest, we have attributes like [TestClass]
and [TestMethod]
to mark our methods as tests.
Also, don't use filler words like "Success" or "IsCorrect" in our test names. Instead, let's tell what "success" and "correct" means for that test. Is it a successful test because it doesn't throw exceptions? Is it successful because it returns a value? Make your test names easy to understand.
2. Do not use the right assertion methods
Follow the Arrange/Act/Assert principle. Separate the body of your tests to differentiate these three parts.
For the Assert part of your tests, make sure to use an assertion library. MSTest, NUnit and XUnit are the three most popular ones for C#.
Use the right assertion methods of your library. For example, MSTest has assertion methods for strings, collections and other objects. For a list of the most common MSTest assertions methods, check the Cheatsheet in Unit Testing 101.
Please, don't do.
Assert.AreEqual(null, result);
// or
Assert.AreEqual(true, anotherResult);
Prefer.
Assert.IsNull(result);
// or
Assert.IsTrue(anotherResult);
3. Do not have a single assertion per test
Have only one Act and Assert part in your tests. Don't repeat the same Act part with different test values in a single test.
Please, avoid writing test like this one.
[TestMethod]
public void Remove_SubstringWithDifferentCase_RemovesSubstring()
{
var str = "Hello, world!";
var transformed = str.RemoveAll("Hello").IgnoringCase();
Assert.AreEqual(", world!", transformed);
transformed = str.RemoveAll("HELLO").IgnoringCase();
Assert.AreEqual(", world!", transformed);
transformed = str.RemoveAll("HeLlO").IgnoringCase();
Assert.AreEqual(", world!", transformed);
}
Or like this one.
[TestMethod]
public void Remove_SubstringWithDifferentCase_RemovesSubstring()
{
var str = "Hello, world!";
var testCases = new string[]
{
"Hello",
"HELLO",
"HeLlO"
};
string transformed;
foreach (var str in testCases)
{
transformed = str.RemoveAll("Hello").IgnoringCase();
Assert.AreEqual(", world!", transformed);
}
}
If we want to test the same scenario with different test values, let's use parameterized tests.
Parameterized tests with MSTest
To write a parameterized test with MSTest, we can follow these steps:
- Replace the
[TestMethod]
attribute with the[DataTestMethod]
attribute in your test. - Add
[DataRow]
attributes for each set of test values. - Add parameters for each test value inside the
[DataRow]
attributes. - Use the input parameters in your test to arrange, act or assert.
Let's convert the previous test with many test values into a parameterized test.
[DataTestMethod]
[DataRow("Hello")]
[DataRow("HELLO")]
[DataRow("HeLlo")]
public void Remove_SubstringWithDifferentCase_RemovesSubstring(string substringToRemove)
{
var str = "Hello, world!";
var transformed = str.RemoveAll(substringToRemove).IgnoringCase();
Assert.AreEqual(", world!", transformed);
}
4. Repeat logic in your assertions
I can't stress this enough. Don't repeat the logic under test in your assertions. Use known, hard-coded, pre-calculated values, instead.
We shouldn't copy the tested logic and paste it in a private method in our tests to use it in our assertions. We will have code, and bugs, in two places.
Please, don't write assertions like the one in this test.
[TestMethod]
public void Remove_ASubstring_RemovesThatSubstringFromTheEnd()
{
string str = "Hello, world!";
string transformed = str.Remove("world!").From(The.End);
var position = str.IndexOf("world!");
var expected = str.Substring(0, position);
Assert.AreEqual(expected, transformed);
}
For this test, instead of using the Substring()
method to remove the input string, use a known expected value. Write Assert.AreEqual("Hello,", transformed)
. For example,
[TestMethod]
public void Remove_ASubstring_RemovesThatSubstringFromTheEnd()
{
string str = "Hello, world!";
string transformed = str.Remove("world!").From(The.End);
// Let's use a known value in our assertions
Assert.AreEqual("Hello,", transformed)
}
Voilà! These are four common misatkes mistakes when writing our first unit tests. Remember to put your test in the right places following a naming convention. Also, keep one assertion per test and don't repeat logic in your assertions. You will have better tests avoiding these mistakes.
If you want to practice identifying and fixing these mistakes, check my Unit Testing 101 repository. You will find the tests that Stringie developers wrote and some other misatkes mistakes they made. Your mission, Jim, should you choose to accept it, is to fix them.
Upgrade your unit testing skills with my course: Mastering C# Unit Testing with Real-world Examples on Udemy. Practice with hands-on exercises and learn best practices by refactoring real-world unit tests.
Happy testing!
Top comments (2)
Nice article. I'm not a huge fan of looping through assertions though; this makes troubleshooting newly-failed tests a little more difficult in my experience. I haven't tried the
DataRow
approach though, I'm going to give that a try tonight.Thanks for your comment, Erik. Sure, give it a try!