Mykolas Mankevicius

Posted on Jul 26, 2022

Vitest is fast, jest is faster *

#vue #vitest #javascript #testing

for the more real world cases

https://vitest.dev/ is claiming to be blazing fast, and that maybe the case for some very unity tests with no dependencies.

But if you're writing real world more feature/integration "unit" tests you're better of sticking with what you have already.

I won't go into much detail, but be aware of the issues before deciding to migrate to vitest

Github issues discussing the problems:

I've migrated a large codebase not aware of these issues and now have to wait 10/15 minutes on ci pipeline instead of the 3/4 minutes i used to with jest.

Just be aware of these things before going down the same road i've done.

Top comments (6)

Jiri Spac • Oct 13 '22 • Edited

This article is wrong. If you are working on a modern codebase with TS and es modules, it is fastest test runner ATM, see this comment:
github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issue...

Slowdowns only occur for flow and maybe less files.
For the second problem with coverage, it has been fixed in vitest.

@neophen can you add benchmarks to provide some proof to this "article" of yours?

Mykolas Mankevicius • Nov 8 '22

So I'm still getting the issues of slow tests, I don't care much about the "a modern codebase with TS and es modules"

A lot of people are still working on old codebases and migrating to vitest hoping to get speed benefits will get burnt. So will not redact my statement so far.

Mykolas Mankevicius • Nov 8 '22

And actually github issue

If you scroll down you still see people have a lot of issues of vitest being 3x slower than jest.

Mykolas Mankevicius • Oct 14 '22

It might be wrong by now. I’ll update the article when I have some spare time :)

TheNotary • Jan 11 '23

I think this article is still up-to-date. I just came to a project that used vitest instead of CRA to see what it was like to create a react app in a different way. I've just added 3 unit tests that test the <Home /> page produces "Sign in" text somewhere and a few other assertions, but it takes 8 seconds for the test to run. That's a really long time for my computer: Duration 8.60s (transform 626ms, setup 25ms, collect 6.65s, tests 517ms). I'm trying to run tests using the ordinary way, but the configs are all screwed up so we might end up starting over with CRA + typescript if we can't narrow down the problem.

Joel Sullivan • Apr 18 • Edited

Vitest was slower for me, too, initially. However, using this article and the tips on performance in this short note, I was able to accelerate Vitest by ~4x for my 800 tests, making it faster than Jest. All I had to do was add the following to my Vitest config:

    // Speed things up a bit -- these help but probably won't be needed someday
    maxConcurrency: 20,
    pool: 'vmThreads',
    poolOptions: {
      threads: {
        singleThread: true,
      }
    },
    isolate: false, // only safe with the poolOptions above
    css: false,
    deps: {
      optimizer:{
        web: {
          enabled: true,
        }
      }
    },

But who knows, maybe I was overlooking ways to accelerate Jest, too. In any case, I'm very happy with my Vitest performance now, and grateful for this article and the other helpful article I referenced above.
Thank you for sharing your experience!

DEV Community

Vitest is fast, jest is faster *

Top comments (6)

Read next

Playwright vs Cypress: A Brief Comparison for End-to-End Testing

WEB3 BetCandidate

I made a simple vscode extension for json comparison

The Future of Web Development: How Astro and Solid Start are Redefining Performance and Flexibility in 2024