Is GraphQL a REST API?

No I don't think you can consider GraphQL to be a kind of REST, since it doesn't follow the precepts of REST:

• it doesn't use http verbs/methods in a semantic was
• it doesn't supply different resources at different URLs
• it doesn't use uniform interface for the URLs (i.e. that the path follows conventions like /users/:id)
• it doesn't leverage (or even care about) media types (e.g. getting the same resource as JSON, XML, or something else entirely)

The only real overlap is that GraphQL typically uses http (though it doesn't really require that, conceptually) and a JSON-like syntax (just as actual JSON tends to be the preferred REST body syntax).

You might be interested in this, as I used to.

• REST API has its maturity levels and doesn't necessarily use JSON. Most aren't that mature, I believe.

Please explain, what is HATEOAS?

Pacharapol Withayasakpunt ・ Aug 9 ・ 1 min read

#computerscience #explainlikeimfive #restful #hateoas

• GraphQL always doesn't use JSON. Instead, it uses a different specification. Also, it doesn't necessarily send over HTTP. It usually exposes only a single endpoint.

"GraphQL vs REST" is ill-typed

Corey O'Connor ・ Oct 25 '19 ・ 3 min read

#graphql #rest #pedantry

• Yes, most REST API vs GraphQL comparisons miss the point. It's Apple vs Orange.