The Benefits of Using Constants in Python Unit Tests: A Beginner's Perspective 🔢

Outlines

• Introduction 🌟
• Python unittest Example 🤖
• Testing Expected Exceptions 🤚
• Conclusion 🤝✅

Introduction 🌟

As a beginner in unit testing, I recently learned from PythonTutorial.net that when writing Python unit tests, it's important to ensure that the code is not only functional but also readable. Readability makes it easier for other developers to understand the code and make changes, which ultimately leads to more maintainable code. In this blog post, I want to share my insights on how using constants in Python unit tests can promote readability and improve the overall quality of the code.

Note: I've recently gained new knowledge about unit testing, and I'm excited to share it with you. Please consider that the information below represents my current understanding, which may evolve over time. I'll continue to update and refine this post as I learn more about the intricacies of unit testing. Your understanding and patience are greatly appreciated.

Python unittest Example 🤖

Square class:

The original code snippet tests the Square class, where it initializes an instance of the class with a length of 10 and checks if the area is equal to 100. While this test case is simple, it doesn't take into account different values that can be passed to the Square class. By using constants, we can easily modify the test cases to cover a wider range of values.

Original:

In the suggested code snippet, we define a constant VALUE_RANGE to set the maximum value for the test cases. We then define constants for each test case, such as POSITIVE_INT_VALUE and POSITIVE_FLOAT_VALUE, which represent a positive integer and float within the VALUE_RANGE, respectively. We also define POWER_OF_TWO_PIV and POWER_OF_TWO_PFV, which represent the expected area for the positive integer and float, respectively.

My suggestion:

By using constants, we can easily modify the range of values to be tested and the expected results without having to modify each individual test case. This makes the test cases more maintainable and easier to understand, especially when we need to update the values or add new test cases.

Testing Expected Exceptions 🤚

In the original fixed code snippet, the Square class raises a TypeError if the length is not an integer or float and raises a ValueError if the length is negative.

Original fixed class:

However, this approach may not be ideal in real-world scenarios since modifying a class directly can have unintended consequences and should be avoided. In such scenarios, it's better to communicate with the developer responsible for the module and provide feedback on the failed test cases. We still can test it by making a new test class file called fixed_square.py.

Suggested class:

In the suggested code snippet, we modify the Square class to only accept a length parameter and remove the exception handling code. We then define constants for each test case, such as POSITIVE_INT_VALUE and POSITIVE_FLOAT_VALUE, which represent a positive integer and float within the VALUE_RANGE, respectively. We also define POWER_OF_TWO_PIV and POWER_OF_TWO_PFV, which represent the expected area for the positive integer and float, respectively. Take a look at the final original unittest for comparison.

Final original unittest:

By using constants, we can easily modify the test cases to cover a wider range of values without having to modify the class. Additionally, we can easily modify the range of values to be tested and the expected results without having to modify each individual test case. This makes the test cases more maintainable and easier to understand, especially when we need to update the values or add new test cases.

Final suggestion unittest:

Conclusion 🤝✅

Based on the new knowledge gained from PythonTutorial.net, using constants in Python unit tests can promote readability and improve code quality in the following ways:

1. Defining constants for the range of values to be tested and the expected results can easily modify the test cases to cover a wider range of values without having to modify each individual test case.
2. Constants make test cases more maintainable and easier to understand, especially when updating values or adding new test cases.
3. Modifying a class directly may not be a good practice in real-world scenarios, and we should communicate with the developer responsible for the module instead.

As a beginner in unit testing, I hope that sharing my insights can help others who are also starting their journey in writing Python unit tests. I am always looking to improve my skills and welcome feedback and suggestions in the comments section below. Let's learn and grow together!

Follow me anywhere

ranggakd - Link in Bio & Creator Tools | Beacons

@ranggakd | center details summary summary Oh hello there I m a an Programmer AI Tech Writer Data Practitioner Statistics Math Addict Open Source Contributor Quantum Computing Enthusiast details center.

beacons.ai