Vector Library versus Vector Database

In the world of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), efficient data management is crucial for building robust and scalable models. Two key tools that have emerged to address this need are vector libraries and vector databases. While both deal with high-dimensional vector data, they serve distinct purposes and offer unique advantages. In this post, we'll dive into the differences between these two technologies, their strengths, and their practical applications, providing developers with a comprehensive guide to choosing the right tool for their AI projects.

The Core Distinctions between Vector Libraries and Vector Databases

While purpose-built vector databases are powerful tools for similarity searches, other options are available. Before the advent of vector databases, developers relied on vector searching libraries, such as FAISS, ScaNN, and HNSW, for vector retrieval tasks.

Vector search libraries can be valuable for quickly building high-performance vector search prototypes. For instance, FAISS, an open-source library developed by Meta, is designed for efficient similarity search and dense vector clustering. It can handle vector collections of any size, even those that cannot be fully loaded into memory, and provides tools for evaluation and parameter tuning. Despite being written in C++, FAISS offers a Python/NumPy interface, making it accessible to many developers.

However, vector search libraries are lightweight Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) libraries rather than managed solutions with limited functionality. While they can be sufficient for unstructured data processing in small-scale or prototype systems, scaling these libraries to Vector more users becomes increasingly challenging. Moreover, they do not allow modifications to their index data or querying during data import.

Vector databases, on the other hand, are optimized for large-scale unstructured data storage and retrieval. They can store and query millions or even billions of vectors, all while providing real-time responses. This scalability is a testament to their ability to meet growing business needs, providing developers with a sense of reassurance.

Vector databases like Milvus offer user-friendly structured and semi-structured data features, including cloud-nativity, multi-tenancy, and scalability. These features become increasingly important as datasets and user bases grow.

Additionally, vector databases operate at a different abstraction layer than vector search libraries. While vector databases are full-fledged services, ANN libraries are components meant to be integrated into the applications you're developing. In this sense, ANN libraries are one of the many components that vector databases are built on top of, similar to how Elasticsearch is built on top of Apache Lucene.

Vector Libraries: Optimized for efficient similarity search

Vector search algorithms play a crucial role in enabling efficient similarity searches for high-dimensional data. Several types of algorithms, each with its own strengths and trade-offs, are designed to accelerate the vector search process while maintaining acceptable levels of accuracy and recall. Here is a list of four different types of vector search algorithms:

• hash-based indexing (e.g., locality-sensitive hashing),
• tree-based indexing (e.g., ANNOY),
• cluster-based or cluster indexing (e.g., product quantization), and
• graph-based indexing (e.g., HNSW)

Vector libraries are lightweight Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) libraries, such as Faiss, HNSW, and ScANN. They are designed to optimize efficient similarity search and clustering of dense vectors.

Top Vector Search Libraries and Algorithms

Faiss (Facebook AI Similarity Search) Library

Faiss is a vector search library developed by the team at Meta. It has multiple indices implemented, including Flat indexes, Cell-probe methods (IndexIVF indexes), IndexHNSW variants, Locality Sensitive Hashing methods, and Indexes based on Product Quantization codes.

Learn more about FAISS | Github | Documentation

HNSW (graph-based)

The Hierarchical Navigable Small World (HNSW) algorithm is a fully graph-based approach for approximate nearest neighbor searches that incrementally builds a multi-layer structure of hierarchical proximity graphs, with elements randomly assigned to maximum layers using an exponentially decaying probability distribution. This design, combined with starting searches from the upper layer, scale separation of links, and a heuristic for selecting proximity graph neighbors, enables HNSW to achieve logarithmic complexity scaling and outperform previous open-source vector-only approaches in terms of performance, especially at high recall levels and with highly clustered data.

Learn more about HNSW | Github | Paper

DiskANN (graph-based)

DiskANN is an ANNS algorithm that balances high accuracy and low DRAM footprint by leveraging auxiliary SSD storage. This approach allows DiskANN to index larger vector datasets per machine than state-of-the-art DRAM-based solutions, making it a cost-effective and scalable option. SSD storage will enable DiskANN to index up to a billion vectors while maintaining 95% search accuracy with low 5ms latencies. In contrast, existing DRAM-based algorithms typically peak at indexing 100-200 million vectors for similar latency and accuracy levels. DiskANN's ability to index datasets 5-10 times larger than DRAM-based solutions on a single machine opens up new possibilities for scalable and accurate vector search in various domains without expensive DRAM resources.

Learn more about DiskANN | Github

ANNOY

Annoy (Approximate Nearest Neighbors Oh Yeah) takes a tree-based approach to approximate nearest neighbor searches, utilizing a forest of binary trees as its core data structure. For those familiar with random forests or gradient-boosted decision trees in machine learning, Annoy can be seen as a natural extension of these algorithms but applied to approximate nearest-neighbor searches instead of prediction tasks.

While HNSW builds upon connected graphs and skip lists, Annoy's key idea is to partition the vector space repeatedly and search only a subset of these partitions for nearest neighbors. This tree-based indexing approach offers a unique trade-off between search speed and accuracy, making Annoy a compelling choice for applications that demand a balance between these two factors.

Learn more about ANNOY | Github | Documentation

NVIDIA CAGRA

CAGRA is a graph construction approach that uses GPU parallelism for approximate nearest-neighbor searches. Unlike the iterative CPU-based method used in HNSW, CAGRA begins by creating an initial dense graph using IVFPQ or NN-DESCENT, where nodes have numerous neighbors. It then sorts and prunes less important edges, optimizing the graph structure for efficient GPU-accelerated traversal. By embracing a GPU-friendly construction process, CAGRA aims to fully utilize modern GPUs' parallel processing capabilities for faster high-dimensional nearest-neighbor searches.

Learn more about CAGRA | Documentation | Paper

Vector Database: Optimized for production use cases

Vector databases are solutions designed to store, index, and query vector data efficiently. They are especially useful for large-scale production applications.

Key Advantages of Vector Databases:

Scalability: Vector databases are built to handle large volumes of high-dimensional data, allowing for horizontal scaling across multiple machines as data grows.
Production workloads: Vector databases can handle constant changes to your data via upserts, deletes, etc., and automatically update the index to ensure performant queries.
Integrated Data Management: With built-in tools for data management, querying, and result retrieval, vector databases simplify integration and accelerate development time.

To illustrate the difference between Vector Libraries and Vector Databases in abstraction, consider inserting a new unstructured data element into a vector database. In Milvus, this process is straightforward:

from pymilvus import Collection
collection = Collection('book')
mr = collection.insert(data)

You can easily insert data into Milvus with just three lines of code. In contrast, vector search libraries like FAISS or ScaNN lack this simplicity and often require manually re-creating the entire index at certain checkpoints to accommodate new data. Even if this were possible, vector search libraries still lack the scalability and multi-tenancy features that make vector databases invaluable for large-scale applications.

While vector search libraries can be useful for prototyping and small-scale applications, vector databases are better suited for production environments with growing datasets and user bases.

By understanding the strengths and limitations of both approaches, developers can make informed decisions and leverage the most appropriate tools for their vector search and unstructured data management needs.

Choosing the Right Tool: Performance vs. Scalability

When it comes to choosing between vector libraries and vector databases, the decision often boils down to a trade-off between performance and scalability. Here is a simple table with some of the key differences.

Vector Libraries: Ideal for prototyping or datasets that don’t change much.

Vector Databases: Optimized for efficient storage, retrieval, and management of large-scale, high-dimensional data, making them well-suited for AI development and deployment at scale.

Conclusion:

As AI and machine learning continue to push the boundaries of innovation, the efficient management of high-dimensional vector data remains a critical challenge. While vector libraries and databases play important roles in this domain, understanding their strengths and limitations is crucial for leveraging the right tool.

Vector libraries, such as FAISS, Annoy, and HNSW, excel in providing high-performance similarity search and vector clustering capabilities. These lightweight libraries are well-suited for prototyping, small-scale applications, and scenarios where datasets are relatively static and don't require frequent updates.

On the other hand, vector databases, like Milvus, are designed to thrive in production environments with large-scale, ever-growing datasets and user bases. With their scalability, integrated data management features, and ability to handle frequent updates seamlessly, vector databases empower organizations to develop and deploy AI solutions that can scale effortlessly.

Ultimately, the choice between a vector library and a vector database depends on the specific requirements of your project, the size and dynamic nature of your dataset, and the balance you need to strike between performance and scalability.