DEV Community

Cover image for Introducing Object.fromEntries
Laurie
Laurie

Posted on • Edited on • Originally published at tenmilesquare.com

Introducing Object.fromEntries

I've been loving this series because it gives me the opportunity to really dive into some of these new features.

Today, we're looking at Object.fromEntries!

Let's start with Object.entries

The first thing to know is that in a previous version of ECMAScript, we were introduced to Object.entries. This was a nifty function that allowed us to iterate through the keys and values in an object by turning it into an array.

At its most basic it transformed an object like this.

const obj = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
const entries = Object.entries(obj)
// [['a', 1], ['b', 2], ['c', 3]]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

But a more common use case was to iterate through that result.

const obj = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
const entries = Object.entries(obj)

for(const [key, value] of entries) {
    // do something with key and value here
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

However, when you used Object.entries you'd be stuck with your data in an array. Then along comes Object.fromEntries.

Enter Object.fromEntries

As it turns out, Object.fromEntries is just the inverse of Object.entries. Take this example.

const obj = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
const entries = Object.entries(obj)
const newObj = Object.fromEntries(entries)
// {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This example doesn't do anything other than change the data structure back and forth. But with so many helper functions available for arrays, it's easy to see the benefits of being able to do this.

Why we want this

We have so many wonderful functions that allow us to transform arrays. Things like map, reduce, filter, flat and flatMap. Object.entries gave us the ability to use them for objects too. If we transformed our Object into an Array they were available for use.

const obj = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
const result = Object.entries(obj).map(([key, value]) => [key, value * 2]) 
// [['a', 2], ['b', 4], ['c', 6]]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

But without Object.fromEntries we're stuck with our transformation in an Array structure. With its addition, we can do this instead!

const obj = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
const result = Object.fromEntries(
         Object.entries(obj).map(
            ([key, value]) => [key, value * 2]
         ))
// {a: 2, b: 4, c: 6}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Not just objects

One of the great things about this function is that it works on all iterables. That means you can turn an Array into an Object, but you can also turn a Map into an Object.

const map = new Map([ ['a', 1], ['b', 2], ['c', 3] ]);
const obj = Object.fromEntries(map);
// {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

One thing to watch out for

There is a difference between an Object and an Array in that the latter does not require unique keys. This means Object.fromEntries can cause you to drop information.

const arr = [['a', 1], ['a', 2], ['c', 3]]
const entries = Object.fromEntries(arr)
// {a: 2, c: 3}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In this example, we've lost the value 1.

And that's that

And there we have it! Being able to use all of the array manipulation functions for objects is incredibly useful! And having Object.fromEntries closes the loop that Object.entries created.

Hope you've enjoyed our ES2019 fun!

Top comments (14)

Collapse
 
yuetsu profile image
yuetsu

Great write up & explanation, thank you! One possible typo — in your final code example, you say —

This means Object.fromEntries can cause you to drop information.

However, in the code example that follows, you have —

const arr = [['a', 1], ['a', 2], ['c', 3]]
const entries = Object.entries(arr)
// {a: 2, c: 3}

... shouldn't that be, on the 2nd line — const entries = Object.fromEntries(arr) ??

Thought you'd want to know. But this is great and I learned a lot from both this and your other guide on for...in (Objects) and for...of (Arrays). Keep up the great work!

Collapse
 
laurieontech profile image
Laurie

Thanks for catching that! I’ll take a look.

Collapse
 
jsmccrumb profile image
Jacob McCrumb

Thanks for the writeup! Worth noting this is already in Chrome, Firefox, Node 12 but not Edge:

MDN Object.fromEntries

Without it I have been using reduce to make an object from array of key-value pairs... this will be a lot easier!

Collapse
 
ggenya132 profile image
Eugene Vedensky

To no one's surprise, not Edge.

Collapse
 
laurieontech profile image
Laurie

Definitely worth noting! Thanks for that.

Collapse
 
treddson profile image
Taylor Short

Thank you so much for this article! Learned something new today. I think there may be a typo here:

But without Object.forEntries we're stuck with our transformation in an Array structure. With its addition, we can do this instead!..

where you said Object.forEntries instead of Object.fromEntries.

Collapse
 
laurieontech profile image
Laurie

Ah, thank you! Will fix that one.

Collapse
 
ggenya132 profile image
Eugene Vedensky

Oddly enough, what I found most helpful was the example of destructuring array arguments during the map, it's not a pattern I see very often in my to see an array containing arrays, but that syntax will be incredibly helpful.

Collapse
 
laurieontech profile image
Laurie
Collapse
 
jnschrag profile image
Jacque Schrag

This is fantastic! No more having to use .reduce to convert an array back into an Object. 🎉 I know this isn't yet supported in Edge - is there a polyfill for it?

Collapse
 
laurieontech profile image
Laurie

So it looks like it might be supported by Edge? At least according to this.
github.com/feross/fromentries

Collapse
 
jnschrag profile image
Jacque Schrag

I think they mean the ponyfill is supported in Edge. But maybe not! The wording is kind of ambiguous there.

Thread Thread
 
laurieontech profile image
Laurie

Agreed.

Collapse
 
eshunsharma profile image
Eshun Sharma

Great article. I didn't know we could turn an array into an object with this :)