Pass by copy, pass by reference. which is better?
TL;DR: Beware of passing arguments by reference
Problems
Unexpected Results
Side Effects
Readability
Broken Encapsulation
Solutions
Pass arguments by copying even large objects. Don't make premature optimizations.
Declare variables as constants
Refactor the code
Make objects immutable to avoid accidental changes
5 Use Pure Functions
Context
A call-by-reference language like C# or PHP makes it more difficult for a programmer to track the effects of a function call, and may introduce subtle bugs.
This is a very old technique present in low-level languages to favor performance and avoid the cost of copying large structures.
Some languages like Go use pass-by-value semantics.
When you pass arguments to a function, copies are made.
However, when you pass a pointer to an object, you can modify the original object within the function. This is another code smell.
On the contrary, functional languages forbid this mechanism completely.
Sample Code
Wrong
using System;
namespace Example
{
class Betelgeuse
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
double starSize = 100.0;
Console.WriteLine("star size: {0}", starSize);
// star size: 100
double supernovaSize = SimulateFinalSize(ref starSize);
// Notice 'ref' modifier
Console.WriteLine("supernova size: {0}", supernovaSize);
// supernova size: 10000
Console.WriteLine("original star size after: {0}", starSize);
// original star size after: 10000
// WRONG: It should not be affected
}
public static double SimulateFinalSize(ref double size)
{
// Notice 'ref' modifier
// Oversimplification
// You should use Sedov-Taylor solution
size = size * 100;
return size;
}
}
}
Right
using System;
namespace Example
{
class Betelgeuse
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
const double starSize = 100.0;
// The const modifier warns the compiler
Console.WriteLine("star size: {0}", starSize);
// star size: 100
double supernovaSize = SimulateFinalSize(starSize);
// Notice 'ref' is omitted
Console.WriteLine("supernova size: {0}", supernovaSize);
// supernova size: 10000
Console.WriteLine("original star size after: {0}", starSize);
// original star size after: 100
// It remains at the original value
}
public static double SimulateFinalSize(double size)
{
// Notice 'ref' is omitted
// Oversimplification
// You should use Sedov-Taylor solution
size = size * 100;
return size;
}
}
}
Detection
[X] Semi-Automatic
You can use many linters to warn with arguments passed by reference
Tags
- Readability
Conclusion
Passing objects by reference can lead to unexpected side effects if the function modifies the object in a way that wasn't anticipated by the caller.
You should use copy by value instead.
Relations
More Info
Disclaimer
Code Smells are my opinion.
Credits
Make it correct, make it clear, make it concise, make it fast. In that order.
Wes Dyer
This article is part of the CodeSmell Series.
Top comments (2)
Still a big issue in plain JavaScript, even with
Object.freeze, if not applied correctly. Fortunately, many good libraries do exist for immutability and functional programming in Js!you'd love this one
Code Smell 127 - Mutable Constants
Maxi Contieri ・ Apr 5 '22